Showing results (1-10 of 217) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 22
Clinical & Experimental Optometry|December 6, 2023
Which glaucoma patients benefit from 10-2 visual field testing? Proposing the functional vulnerability zone frameworkJack Phu, Daniel Rafla, Michael KalloniatisClinical & Experimental Optometry|March 14, 2024
The effect of macular visual field test density on central structure-function concordance in glaucomaDaniel Rafla, Michael Kalloniatis, Jack PhuOphthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)|March 25, 2023
Visualising structural and functional characteristics distinguishing between newly diagnosed high-tension and low-tension glaucoma patientsDaniel Rafla, Sieu K Khuu, Sahana Kashyap, et al.Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)|May 22, 2022
Gaze tracker parameters have little association with visual field metrics of intrasession frontloaded SITA-Faster 24-2 visual field resultsJack Phu, Michael KalloniatisOphthalmology|March 16, 2021
Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect PatientsJack Phu, Michael KalloniatisClinical & Experimental Optometry|August 17, 2021
Patient and technician perspectives following the introduction of frontloaded visual field testing in glaucoma assessmentJack Phu, Michael KalloniatisTranslational Vision Science & Technology|November 15, 2021
The Frontloading Fields Study (FFS): Detecting Changes in Mean Deviation in Glaucoma Using Multiple Visual Field Tests Per Clinical VisitJack Phu, Michael KalloniatisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology|May 5, 2021
Viability of Performing Multiple 24-2 Visual Field Examinations at the Same Clinical Visit: The Frontloading Fields Study (FFS)Jack Phu, Michael KalloniatisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology|July 5, 2020
Ability of 24-2C and 24-2 Grids to Identify Central Visual Field Defects and Structure-Function Concordance in Glaucoma and SuspectsJack Phu, Michael KalloniatisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology|August 11, 2020
A Strategy for Seeding Point Error Assessment for Retesting (SPEAR) in Perimetry Applied to Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With GlaucomaJack Phu, Michael KalloniatisPageof 22