Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David Moher

Showing results (541-550 of 829) with videos related to

Pageof 83
Sort By:
Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen|November 14, 2016
[The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement]Eric I Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 9, 2017
Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventionsMatthew J Page, Douglas G Altman, Larissa Shamseer, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 6, 2017
Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysisMatthew J Page, Douglas G Altman, Joanne E McKenzie, et al.
Plos One|July 13, 2017
The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trialsFerrán Catalá-López, Brian Hutton, Amparo Núñez-Beltrán, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|July 28, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
Plos Medicine|July 22, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
Plos One|March 28, 2014
The quality of reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews and suggestions for improvementBrian Hutton, Georgia Salanti, Anna Chaimani, et al.
F1000Research|January 23, 2026
What goes in a funder's Narrative CV?: A Scoping ReviewMarc Antonino Albert, Aleeza Qayyum, Kailyn MacKinnon, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 23, 2021
A Cross-sectional literature survey showed the reporting quality of multicenter randomized controlled trials should be improvedXuan Zhang, Wai Ching Lam, Fan Liu, et al.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition|January 4, 2025
Reliability and reproducibility of systematic reviews informing the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a pilot studyAlexandra M Bodnaruc, Hassan Khan, Nicole Shaver, et al.
Pageof 83

Showing results (541-550 of 829) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 83
Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen|November 14, 2016
[The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement]Eric I Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 9, 2017
Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventionsMatthew J Page, Douglas G Altman, Larissa Shamseer, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 6, 2017
Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysisMatthew J Page, Douglas G Altman, Joanne E McKenzie, et al.
Plos One|July 13, 2017
The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trialsFerrán Catalá-López, Brian Hutton, Amparo Núñez-Beltrán, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|July 28, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
Plos Medicine|July 22, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
Plos One|March 28, 2014
The quality of reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews and suggestions for improvementBrian Hutton, Georgia Salanti, Anna Chaimani, et al.
F1000Research|January 23, 2026
What goes in a funder's Narrative CV?: A Scoping ReviewMarc Antonino Albert, Aleeza Qayyum, Kailyn MacKinnon, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 23, 2021
A Cross-sectional literature survey showed the reporting quality of multicenter randomized controlled trials should be improvedXuan Zhang, Wai Ching Lam, Fan Liu, et al.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition|January 4, 2025
Reliability and reproducibility of systematic reviews informing the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a pilot studyAlexandra M Bodnaruc, Hassan Khan, Nicole Shaver, et al.
Pageof 83