Showing results (101-110 of 268) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 27
BMC Medical Research Methodology|August 28, 2016
Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?Uta Wegewitz, Beate Weikert, Alba Fishta, et al.BMC Medical Research Methodology|July 12, 2017
Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewersDawid Pieper, Anja Jacobs, Beate Weikert, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 14, 2025
A metaresearch study finds unclear impact of institutional conflicts of interest on conclusions of studies investigating volume-outcome relationshipsCharlotte M Kugler, Kaethe Goossen, Elie A Akl, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|March 5, 2025
Analysis of indications for selectively missing results in comparative registry-based studies in medicine: a meta-research studyPaula Starke, Zhentian Zhang, Hannah Papmeier, et al.Deutsches Arzteblatt International|August 20, 2024
Interrupted Time Series for Assessing the Causality of Intervention Effects. Part 35 of a Series on Evaluating Scientific PublicationsTim Mathes, Dominik Röding, Constance Stegbauer, et al.Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen|December 10, 2013
[Overviews - status quo, potentials and perspectives]Dawid Pieper, Roland Brian Büchter, Sunya-Lee Antoine, et al.BMC Medical Research Methodology|June 20, 2018
How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reportingDawid Pieper, Nadja Koensgen, Jessica Breuing, et al.JBI Evidence Synthesis|June 27, 2025
Validated geographic search filters for bibliographic databases: a scoping reviewCatharina Muente, Alexander Pachanov, Julian Hirt, et al.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 7, 2019
An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidenceFalk Hoffmann, Daniela Eggers, Dawid Pieper, et al.BMC Medical Research Methodology|June 30, 2019
Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic reviewSiw Waffenschmidt, Marco Knelangen, Wiebke Sieben, et al.Pageof 27