Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Elizabeth Gargon

Showing results (11-20 of 38) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Trials|January 24, 2013
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review GroupsJamie J Kirkham, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 23, 2019
Improvement was needed in the standards of development for cancer core outcome setsElizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Jane M Blazeby, et al.
Plos One|January 12, 2021
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchElizabeth Gargon, Sarah L Gorst, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, et al.
Plos One|December 16, 2016
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of GapsSarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.
Trials|November 13, 2015
The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)Elizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Doug G Altman, et al.
Trials|July 12, 2014
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013Elizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Douglas G Altman, et al.
Database : the Journal of Biological Databases and Curation|November 8, 2019
Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set databaseChristopher R Norman, Elizabeth Gargon, Mariska M G Leeflang, et al.
BMJ Open|October 20, 2021
Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic reviewJamlick Karumbi, Sarah L Gorst, David Gathara, et al.
British Journal of Health Psychology|July 2, 2020
The value of core outcome sets in health psychologyKaren Matvienko-Sikar, Caroline B Terwee, Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Plos One|December 29, 2018
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchElizabeth Gargon, Sarah L Gorst, Nicola L Harman, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (11-20 of 38) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Trials|January 24, 2013
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review GroupsJamie J Kirkham, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 23, 2019
Improvement was needed in the standards of development for cancer core outcome setsElizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Jane M Blazeby, et al.
Plos One|January 12, 2021
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchElizabeth Gargon, Sarah L Gorst, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, et al.
Plos One|December 16, 2016
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of GapsSarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.
Trials|November 13, 2015
The COMET initiative database: progress and activities update (2014)Elizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Doug G Altman, et al.
Trials|July 12, 2014
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013Elizabeth Gargon, Paula R Williamson, Douglas G Altman, et al.
Database : the Journal of Biological Databases and Curation|November 8, 2019
Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set databaseChristopher R Norman, Elizabeth Gargon, Mariska M G Leeflang, et al.
BMJ Open|October 20, 2021
Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic reviewJamlick Karumbi, Sarah L Gorst, David Gathara, et al.
British Journal of Health Psychology|July 2, 2020
The value of core outcome sets in health psychologyKaren Matvienko-Sikar, Caroline B Terwee, Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Plos One|December 29, 2018
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchElizabeth Gargon, Sarah L Gorst, Nicola L Harman, et al.
Pageof 4