Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Elodia Cole

Showing results (11-20 of 15) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 15 results.
Academic Radiology|July 15, 2009
Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimensLaura Faulconer, Chris Parham, Dean M Connor, et al.
Academic Radiology|May 19, 2004
Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveysEtta D Pisano, Yen-Feng Chiu, Liyun Ni, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs|February 24, 2025
Design considerations and challenges in the CHinA National CancEr Screening (CHANCES) trial and Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST)Ping Hu, Jon A Steingrimsson, Elodia Cole, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR|May 17, 2019
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot StudyGeunwon Kim, Jordana Phillips, Elodia Cole, et al.
Academic Radiology|December 29, 2009
Effect of breast compression on lesion characteristic visibility with diffraction-enhanced imagingLaura S Faulconer, Chris A Parham, Dean M Connor, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (11-20 of 15) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 15 results.
Academic Radiology|July 15, 2009
Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimensLaura Faulconer, Chris Parham, Dean M Connor, et al.
Academic Radiology|May 19, 2004
Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveysEtta D Pisano, Yen-Feng Chiu, Liyun Ni, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs|February 24, 2025
Design considerations and challenges in the CHinA National CancEr Screening (CHANCES) trial and Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST)Ping Hu, Jon A Steingrimsson, Elodia Cole, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR|May 17, 2019
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot StudyGeunwon Kim, Jordana Phillips, Elodia Cole, et al.
Academic Radiology|December 29, 2009
Effect of breast compression on lesion characteristic visibility with diffraction-enhanced imagingLaura S Faulconer, Chris A Parham, Dean M Connor, et al.
Pageof 2