Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Friedrich Semturs

Showing results (1-10 of 12) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)|October 25, 2024
3D Printing Materials Mimicking Human Tissues after Uptake of Iodinated Contrast Agents for Anthropomorphic Radiology PhantomsPeter Homolka, Lara Breyer, Friedrich Semturs
Physica Medica : PM : an International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology : Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)|August 7, 2016
Spectrum optimization for computed radiography mammography systemsMichael Figl, Peter Homolka, Friedrich Semturs, et al.
Scientific Reports|April 12, 2019
Comparison of a personalized breast dosimetry method with standard dosimetry protocolsElisabeth Salomon, Peter Homolka, Friedrich Semturs, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|September 1, 2016
Conversion factors between human and automatic readouts of CDMAM phantom images of CR mammography systemsMichael Figl, Peter Homolka, Angelika Osanna-Elliott, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|December 17, 2005
Image quality of a wet laser printer versus a paper printer for full-field digital mammogramsGerd Schueller, Elisabeth Kaindl, Wolfgang K Matzek, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|March 27, 2013
A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammographyHugo de las Heras, Felix Schöfer, Britta Tiller, et al.
Radiology. Imaging Cancer|July 12, 2024
AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human PerformanceDaphne Resch, Roberto Lo Gullo, Jonas Teuwen, et al.
Medical Physics|October 8, 2011
Factors for conversion between human and automatic read-outs of CDMAM imagesMichael Figl, Rainer Hoffmann, Marcus Kaar, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|December 26, 2006
Validation of image quality in full-field digital mammography: is the replacement of wet by dry laser printers justified?Gerd Schueller, Elisabeth Kaindl, Herbert Langenberger, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 14, 2012
Teleradiology with uncompressed digital mammograms: clinical assessmentJulia Fruehwald-Pallamar, Marion Jantsch, Katja Pinker, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 12) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)|October 25, 2024
3D Printing Materials Mimicking Human Tissues after Uptake of Iodinated Contrast Agents for Anthropomorphic Radiology PhantomsPeter Homolka, Lara Breyer, Friedrich Semturs
Physica Medica : PM : an International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology : Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)|August 7, 2016
Spectrum optimization for computed radiography mammography systemsMichael Figl, Peter Homolka, Friedrich Semturs, et al.
Scientific Reports|April 12, 2019
Comparison of a personalized breast dosimetry method with standard dosimetry protocolsElisabeth Salomon, Peter Homolka, Friedrich Semturs, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|September 1, 2016
Conversion factors between human and automatic readouts of CDMAM phantom images of CR mammography systemsMichael Figl, Peter Homolka, Angelika Osanna-Elliott, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|December 17, 2005
Image quality of a wet laser printer versus a paper printer for full-field digital mammogramsGerd Schueller, Elisabeth Kaindl, Wolfgang K Matzek, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|March 27, 2013
A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammographyHugo de las Heras, Felix Schöfer, Britta Tiller, et al.
Radiology. Imaging Cancer|July 12, 2024
AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human PerformanceDaphne Resch, Roberto Lo Gullo, Jonas Teuwen, et al.
Medical Physics|October 8, 2011
Factors for conversion between human and automatic read-outs of CDMAM imagesMichael Figl, Rainer Hoffmann, Marcus Kaar, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|December 26, 2006
Validation of image quality in full-field digital mammography: is the replacement of wet by dry laser printers justified?Gerd Schueller, Elisabeth Kaindl, Herbert Langenberger, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 14, 2012
Teleradiology with uncompressed digital mammograms: clinical assessmentJulia Fruehwald-Pallamar, Marion Jantsch, Katja Pinker, et al.
Pageof 2