Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

Showing results (21-30 of 49) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|April 25, 2018
Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factorsGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Norman Poh
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|October 6, 2016
What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|November 10, 2009
Analysis of categorical response data: use logistic regression rather than endpoint-difference scores or discriminant analysisGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Maria V Kondaurova
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|July 7, 2007
Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral changeGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Terrance M Nearey
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|January 10, 2016
A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison caseEwald Enzinger, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Felipe Ochoa
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|October 14, 2019
A method for calculating the strength of evidence associated with an earwitness's claimed recognition of a familiar speakerClaudia Rosas, Jorge Sommerhoff, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Forensic Science International|September 5, 2016
Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sistersCuiling Zhang, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger
Forensic Science International|December 7, 2010
An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison systemGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cuiling Zhang, Philip Rose
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|December 5, 2016
Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositionsGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, Cuiling Zhang
Forensic Science International. Synergy|July 17, 2020
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development processGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan
Pageof 5

Showing results (21-30 of 49) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|April 25, 2018
Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factorsGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Norman Poh
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|October 6, 2016
What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|November 10, 2009
Analysis of categorical response data: use logistic regression rather than endpoint-difference scores or discriminant analysisGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Maria V Kondaurova
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America|July 7, 2007
Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral changeGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Terrance M Nearey
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|January 10, 2016
A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison caseEwald Enzinger, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Felipe Ochoa
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|October 14, 2019
A method for calculating the strength of evidence associated with an earwitness's claimed recognition of a familiar speakerClaudia Rosas, Jorge Sommerhoff, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Forensic Science International|September 5, 2016
Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sistersCuiling Zhang, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger
Forensic Science International|December 7, 2010
An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison systemGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cuiling Zhang, Philip Rose
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|December 5, 2016
Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositionsGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, Cuiling Zhang
Forensic Science International. Synergy|July 17, 2020
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development processGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan
Pageof 5