Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Guido Freckmann

Showing results (101-110 of 160) with videos related to

Pageof 16
Sort By:
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|May 21, 2022
Accuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump PrototypeJochen Mende, Annette Baumstark, Delia Waldenmaier, et al.
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)|September 21, 2018
[Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Diabetes: Are we too Lax with Laboratory Parameters?]Rüdiger Landgraf, Matthias Nauck, Guido Freckmann, et al.
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes : Official Journal, German Society of Endocrinology [And] German Diabetes Association|January 29, 2021
Choice of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems May Affect Metrics: Clinically Relevant Differences in Times in RangesGuido Freckmann, Stefan Pleus, Sebastian Schauer, et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics|December 7, 2010
Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparisonHoward Zisser, Robin Wagner, Stefan Pleus, et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|June 10, 2020
Time in Specific Glucose Ranges, Glucose Management Indicator, and Glycemic Variability: Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System Model and Sensor on CGM MetricsStefan Pleus, Ulrike Kamecke, Delia Waldenmaier, et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|November 26, 2022
User Performance Evaluation and System Accuracy Assessment of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems With Color Coding of Measurement ResultsStefan Pleus, Annette Baumstark, Sebastian Schauer, et al.
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care|January 21, 2020
System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015Stefan Pleus, Annette Baumstark, Nina Jendrike, et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics|December 29, 2023
Effect of Arterialization on Venous Blood Glucose Concentrations and Implications for Observed Continuous Glucose Monitoring AccuracyStefan Pleus, Manuela Link, Rolf Hinzmann, et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|September 3, 2015
Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System AccuracyHarald Kirchsteiger, Lutz Heinemann, Guido Freckmann, et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics|February 16, 2010
System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197Guido Freckmann, Annette Baumstark, Nina Jendrike, et al.
Pageof 16

Showing results (101-110 of 160) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 16
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|May 21, 2022
Accuracy Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Patch Pump PrototypeJochen Mende, Annette Baumstark, Delia Waldenmaier, et al.
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)|September 21, 2018
[Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Diabetes: Are we too Lax with Laboratory Parameters?]Rüdiger Landgraf, Matthias Nauck, Guido Freckmann, et al.
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes : Official Journal, German Society of Endocrinology [And] German Diabetes Association|January 29, 2021
Choice of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems May Affect Metrics: Clinically Relevant Differences in Times in RangesGuido Freckmann, Stefan Pleus, Sebastian Schauer, et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics|December 7, 2010
Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparisonHoward Zisser, Robin Wagner, Stefan Pleus, et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|June 10, 2020
Time in Specific Glucose Ranges, Glucose Management Indicator, and Glycemic Variability: Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System Model and Sensor on CGM MetricsStefan Pleus, Ulrike Kamecke, Delia Waldenmaier, et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|November 26, 2022
User Performance Evaluation and System Accuracy Assessment of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems With Color Coding of Measurement ResultsStefan Pleus, Annette Baumstark, Sebastian Schauer, et al.
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care|January 21, 2020
System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015Stefan Pleus, Annette Baumstark, Nina Jendrike, et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics|December 29, 2023
Effect of Arterialization on Venous Blood Glucose Concentrations and Implications for Observed Continuous Glucose Monitoring AccuracyStefan Pleus, Manuela Link, Rolf Hinzmann, et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology|September 3, 2015
Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System AccuracyHarald Kirchsteiger, Lutz Heinemann, Guido Freckmann, et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics|February 16, 2010
System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197Guido Freckmann, Annette Baumstark, Nina Jendrike, et al.
Pageof 16