Showing results (1-10 of 52) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 6
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|December 31, 1997
How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in SwedenP Herberts, H MalchauActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica|April 1, 2000
Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP)P Söderman, H MalchauThe Bone & Joint Journal|April 30, 2015
The use of patient-reported outcomes after routine arthroplasty: beyond the whys and ifsO Rolfson, H MalchauLakartidningen|June 25, 1999
[Many years of registration have improved the quality of hip arthroplasty]P Herberts, H MalchauClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|March 16, 2001
Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?P Söderman, H MalchauActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica|June 14, 2000
Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 casesP Herberts, H MalchauClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|June 15, 2000
Survival of hip replacements. A comparison of a randomized trial and a registryG Garellick, H Malchau, P HerbertsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research|September 12, 2001
Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methodsP Söderman, H Malchau, P HerbertsActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica|June 15, 1999
The economics of preventing revisions in total hip replacementU Persson, M Persson, H MalchauThe Journal of Arthroplasty|July 31, 1999
The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: clinical evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implantsG Garellick, H Malchau, P HerbertsPageof 6