Showing results (31-40 of 66) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 7
Physics in Medicine and Biology|December 16, 2014
Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breastsR W Bouwman, R E van Engen, K C Young, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|December 8, 2005
Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammographyJ T M Jansen, W J H Veldkamp, M A O Thijssen, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 21, 2008
Automated cardiac phase selection with 64-MDCT coronary angiographyRaoul M S Joemai, Jacob Geleijns, Wouter J H Veldkamp, et al.
European Radiology|September 1, 2005
Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practiceWouter J H Veldkamp, Lucia J M Kroft, Mireille V Boot, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|November 23, 2013
Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image qualityRaoul M S Joemai, Wouter J H Veldkamp, Lucia J M Kroft, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|July 23, 2005
Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest diseaseLucia J M Kroft, Wouter J H Veldkamp, Bart J A Mertens, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)|June 28, 2023
Lesion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: human reader experiments indicate no benefit from the integration of information from multiple planesChristiana Balta, Ingrid Reiser, Mireille J M Broeders, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)|March 7, 2019
Signal template generation from acquired images for model observer-based image quality analysis in mammographyChristiana Balta, Ramona W Bouwman, Wouter J H Veldkamp, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|October 18, 2007
Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image qualityL J M Kroft, W J H Veldkamp, B J A Mertens, et al.
Pageof 7