Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

J Richard Hanley

Showing results (1-10 of 39) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)|October 13, 2011
An appreciation of Bruce and Young's (1986) serial stage model of face naming after 25 yearsJ Richard Hanley
Memory & Cognition|February 3, 2011
Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failureJ Richard Hanley
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|March 23, 2011
Why are names of people associated with so many phonological retrieval failures?J Richard Hanley
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|September 21, 2011
The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?J Richard Hanley, Annabel Hayes
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|February 18, 2011
Categorical perception effects reflect differences in typicality on within-category trialsJ Richard Hanley, Debi Roberson
Memory & Cognition|November 24, 2007
Recalling episodic and semantic information about famous faces and voicesLjubica Damjanovic, J Richard Hanley
Memory & Cognition|March 31, 2018
Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effectJ Richard Hanley, Jake Bourgaize
Cognitive Neuropsychology|October 20, 2010
Preservation of memory for people in semantic memory disorder: Further category-specific semantic dissociationJanice Kay, J Richard Hanley
Cognitive Neuropsychology|September 16, 2017
Lexical decision performance in developmental surface dysgraphia: Evidence for a unitary orthographic system that is used in both reading and spellingAndreas Sotiropoulos, J Richard Hanley
Memory (Hove, England)|April 14, 2012
The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item listsJ Richard Hanley, Nikita Shah
Pageof 4

Showing results (1-10 of 39) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)|October 13, 2011
An appreciation of Bruce and Young's (1986) serial stage model of face naming after 25 yearsJ Richard Hanley
Memory & Cognition|February 3, 2011
Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failureJ Richard Hanley
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|March 23, 2011
Why are names of people associated with so many phonological retrieval failures?J Richard Hanley
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|September 21, 2011
The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?J Richard Hanley, Annabel Hayes
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|February 18, 2011
Categorical perception effects reflect differences in typicality on within-category trialsJ Richard Hanley, Debi Roberson
Memory & Cognition|November 24, 2007
Recalling episodic and semantic information about famous faces and voicesLjubica Damjanovic, J Richard Hanley
Memory & Cognition|March 31, 2018
Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effectJ Richard Hanley, Jake Bourgaize
Cognitive Neuropsychology|October 20, 2010
Preservation of memory for people in semantic memory disorder: Further category-specific semantic dissociationJanice Kay, J Richard Hanley
Cognitive Neuropsychology|September 16, 2017
Lexical decision performance in developmental surface dysgraphia: Evidence for a unitary orthographic system that is used in both reading and spellingAndreas Sotiropoulos, J Richard Hanley
Memory (Hove, England)|April 14, 2012
The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item listsJ Richard Hanley, Nikita Shah
Pageof 4