Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jesper Tijmstra

Showing results (1-10 of 25) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|February 25, 2018
Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibilityJesper Tijmstra
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|December 22, 2020
Accounting for individual differences in speed in the discretized signed residual time modelJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|June 22, 2017
Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response timesMaria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra
Frontiers in Psychology|June 29, 2018
On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached ItemsJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
Applied Psychological Measurement|March 5, 2025
Modeling Within- and Between-Person Differences in the Use of the Middle Category in Likert ScalesJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
Psychometrika|August 30, 2019
Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect ResponsesMaria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra
Psychometrika|February 23, 2019
Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory ModelsJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|September 13, 2016
Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracyMaria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra, Dylan Molenaar
Applied Psychological Measurement|September 16, 2025
Distinguishing Between Models for Extreme and Midpoint Response Styles as Opposite Poles of a Single Dimension versus Two Separate Dimensions: A Simulation StudyMartijn Schoenmakers, Maria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra
Behavior Research Methods|January 12, 2018
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scalesJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova, Minjeong Jeon
Pageof 3

Showing results (1-10 of 25) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|February 25, 2018
Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibilityJesper Tijmstra
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|December 22, 2020
Accounting for individual differences in speed in the discretized signed residual time modelJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|June 22, 2017
Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response timesMaria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra
Frontiers in Psychology|June 29, 2018
On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached ItemsJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
Applied Psychological Measurement|March 5, 2025
Modeling Within- and Between-Person Differences in the Use of the Middle Category in Likert ScalesJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
Psychometrika|August 30, 2019
Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect ResponsesMaria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra
Psychometrika|February 23, 2019
Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory ModelsJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|September 13, 2016
Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracyMaria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra, Dylan Molenaar
Applied Psychological Measurement|September 16, 2025
Distinguishing Between Models for Extreme and Midpoint Response Styles as Opposite Poles of a Single Dimension versus Two Separate Dimensions: A Simulation StudyMartijn Schoenmakers, Maria Bolsinova, Jesper Tijmstra
Behavior Research Methods|January 12, 2018
General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scalesJesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova, Minjeong Jeon
Pageof 3