Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Jonathan R Slotkin

Showing results (41-50 of 71) with videos related to

Pageof 8
Sort By:
Neurosurgery|May 16, 2020
A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|January 23, 2026
The comparative impact of body mass index on outcomes following minimally invasive versus open surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: 2-year follow-up from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrés Pascual-Leone, Praveen V Mummaneni, Evan F Joiner, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|January 2, 2018
Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|May 3, 2019
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Spine|August 1, 2024
Predictors of Delayed Clinical Benefit Following Surgical Treatment for Low-grade SpondylolisthesisMladen Djurasovic, Leah Y Carreon, Erica F Bisson, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|January 1, 2023
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registryAndrew K Chan, Mohamad Bydon, Erica F Bisson, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|October 11, 2024
Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis dataJacob Birlingmair, Leah Y Carreon, Mladen Djurasovic, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|May 2, 2020
Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAnthony M DiGiorgio, Praveen V Mummaneni, Paul Park, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|April 16, 2021
Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes DatabaseErica F Bisson, Jian Guan, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|October 17, 2025
Factors associated with long-term deterioration in back pain after surgical treatment for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis at 2 and 5 years: an evaluation from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis dataAndrew J Croft, Steven D Glassman, Shawn W Adams, et al.
Pageof 8

Showing results (41-50 of 71) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 8
Neurosurgery|May 16, 2020
A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|January 23, 2026
The comparative impact of body mass index on outcomes following minimally invasive versus open surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: 2-year follow-up from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrés Pascual-Leone, Praveen V Mummaneni, Evan F Joiner, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|January 2, 2018
Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|May 3, 2019
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisAndrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Spine|August 1, 2024
Predictors of Delayed Clinical Benefit Following Surgical Treatment for Low-grade SpondylolisthesisMladen Djurasovic, Leah Y Carreon, Erica F Bisson, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|January 1, 2023
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registryAndrew K Chan, Mohamad Bydon, Erica F Bisson, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|October 11, 2024
Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis dataJacob Birlingmair, Leah Y Carreon, Mladen Djurasovic, et al.
Neurosurgical Focus|May 2, 2020
Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes DatabaseAnthony M DiGiorgio, Praveen V Mummaneni, Paul Park, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|April 16, 2021
Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes DatabaseErica F Bisson, Jian Guan, Mohamad Bydon, et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine|October 17, 2025
Factors associated with long-term deterioration in back pain after surgical treatment for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis at 2 and 5 years: an evaluation from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis dataAndrew J Croft, Steven D Glassman, Shawn W Adams, et al.
Pageof 8