Showing results (1-10 of 78) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 8
Journal of Animal Science|September 7, 2012
Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systemsK R Stackhouse, C A Rotz, J W Oltjen, et al.Journal of Animal Science|September 7, 2012
Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systemsK R Stackhouse-Lawson, C A Rotz, J W Oltjen, et al.Journal of Animal Science|October 23, 2013
A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systemsC A Rotz, B J Isenberg, K R Stackhouse-Lawson, et al.Animal : an International Journal of Animal Bioscience|October 13, 2024
Effects of heat stress mitigation strategies on feedlot cattle performance, environmental, and economic outcomes in a hot climateS E Mejia Turcios, C A Rotz, J McGlone, et al.Journal of Animal Science|October 3, 2013
Growth promoting technologies reduce greenhouse gas, alcohol, and ammonia emissions from feedlot cattleK R Stackhouse-Lawson, M S Calvo, S E Place, et al.Journal of Animal Science|October 9, 2004
Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal productionC A RotzJournal of Agricultural Safety and Health|June 6, 2008
Worker health and safety in concentrated animal feeding operationsF M Mitloehner, M S CalvoJournal of Dairy Science|July 27, 2010
Invited review: Contemporary environmental issues: a review of the dairy industry's role in climate change and air quality and the potential of mitigation through improved production efficiencyS E Place, F M MitloehnerJournal of Dairy Science|March 11, 1998
Dairy cow culling strategies: making economical culling decisionsT W Lehenbauer, J W OltjenJournal of Animal Science|April 1, 1993
Estimation of the water requirement for beef production in the United StatesJ L Beckett, J W OltjenPageof 8