Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef
K R Stackhouse1, C A Rotz, J W Oltjen
1Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Enhanced animal performance in beef production significantly reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions per unit of product. Growth-promoting technologies offer a cost-effective strategy for mitigating environmental impacts in cattle farming.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Environmental Science
- Animal Science
Background:
- Increased animal performance is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions in livestock production per unit of product.
- Limited data exists on the net emission reduction from beef production systems due to enhanced animal productivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate GHG and NH3 emissions from California beef production systems utilizing various management technologies to enhance animal performance.
- To assess the impact of growth-promoting technologies on the environmental footprint of beef production.
Main Methods:
- A partial life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM).
- IFSM simulates crop growth, feed production, animal performance, and manure management to predict environmental impacts.
- Five beef production systems were simulated: Angus-natural, Angus-implant, Angus-ß2-adrenergic agonists (BAA), Holstein-implant, and Holstein-BAA.
Main Results:
- Use of BAA decreased NH3 emission by 7% in the full production system.
- Combined ionophore, growth implant, and BAA treatments reduced NH3 emission by 13%.
- Carbon footprint reductions were 9% for Angus and 5% for Holstein beef, with specific decreases of 2.2 kg CO2e/kg HCW and 0.5 kg CO2e/kg HCW, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Growth-promoting technologies are cost-effective for mitigating GHG and NH3 emissions in beef production.
- Naturally managed cattle can achieve similar net returns to treated cattle if sold at an 8% premium.
- Enhanced animal productivity offers a viable strategy for reducing the environmental impact of beef production.
Related Concept Videos
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Biofuels
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Microbes and Climate Change
Recombinant DNA
Bioremediation

