Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 1
Journal of Glaucoma|December 20, 2007
Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucomaMichael Sullivan-Mee, Kathy D Halverson, Clifford QuallsJournal of Glaucoma|December 17, 2009
Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometryMichael Sullivan-Mee, Gretchen Gerhardt, Kathy D Halverson, et al.Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry|March 20, 2012
Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurementMichael Sullivan-Mee, Suchitra Katiyar, Denise Pensyl, et al.Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.)|March 4, 2006
Central corneal thickness and normal tension glaucoma: a cross-sectional studyMichael Sullivan-Mee, Kathy D Halverson, Mollie C Saxon, et al.Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.)|February 7, 2006
Relationship between central corneal thickness and severity of glaucomatous visual field loss in a primary care populationMichael Sullivan-Mee, Kathy D Halverson, Glenn B Saxon, et al.Journal of Glaucoma|March 13, 2012
Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometryMichael Sullivan-Mee, Sarah E Lewis, Denise Pensyl, et al.Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry|June 4, 2008
Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucomaMichael Sullivan-Mee, Shavon C Billingsley, Amita D Patel, et al.Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.)|April 19, 2005
The relationship between central corneal thickness-adjusted intraocular pressure and glaucomatous visual-field lossMichael Sullivan-Mee, Kathy D Halverson, Glenn B Saxon, et al.Pageof 1