Showing results (11-20 of 243) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 25
Brain Research|February 5, 1990
Variability of the influence of a visual task on the active micromechanical properties of the cochleaP Froehlich, L Collet, J M Chanal, et al.The International Journal of Neuroscience|July 1, 1988
Are BAEP and MLR suited for the study of a hypothetic peripheral selective attention effect?L Collet, H Hellal, J M Chanal, et al.Brain & Development|July 1, 1993
Evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. A comparison of neonates and adultsL Collet, M Gartner, E Veuillet, et al.Ear and Hearing|April 1, 1993
Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold in sensorineural hearing lossL Collet, V Levy, E Veuillet, et al.Scandinavian Audiology|January 1, 1989
Validity of bone conduction stimulated ABR, MLR and otoacoustic emissionsL Collet, J M Chanal, H Hellal, et al.The Laryngoscope|April 18, 1998
Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant usersE Truy, S Gallego, J M Chanal, et al.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology|March 30, 2001
Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary reportH Thai-Van, J M Chanal, C Coudert, et al.Hearing Research|January 1, 1990
Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjectsL Collet, D T Kemp, E Veuillet, et al.Acta Oto-Laryngologica|May 15, 2001
Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humansE Veuillet, V Martin, B Suc, et al.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology|May 1, 1987
Effect of stimulus intensity variation on brain-stem auditory evoked potentials: comparison between neonates and adultsL Collet, C Delorme, J M Chanal, et al.Pageof 25