Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

M J Lynn

Showing results (51-60 of 59) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 59 results.
JAMA|February 23, 1990
Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study 4 years after surgery for myopia. Perk Study GroupG O Waring, M J Lynn, B Fielding, et al.
Refractive & Corneal Surgery|March 1, 1989
Symmetry of refractive and visual acuity outcome in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) studyM J Lynn, G O Waring, A Nizam, et al.
Ophthalmology|August 1, 1991
Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study five years after surgery. The Perk Study GroupG O Waring, M J Lynn, A Nizam, et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology|February 15, 1991
Stability of refraction during four years after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy studyG O Waring, M J Lynn, E R Strahlman, et al.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology|July 1, 1990
Three year results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) studyG O Waring, M J Lynn, W Culbertson, et al.
Ophthalmology|October 1, 1987
Three-year results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) StudyG O Waring, M J Lynn, W Culbertson, et al.
Neurology|March 21, 2009
Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stentingF Nahab, M J Lynn, S E Kasner, et al.
Ophthalmology|February 1, 1985
Results of the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study one year after surgeryG O Waring, M J Lynn, H Gelender, et al.
Neurology|October 13, 2006
Warfarin vs aspirin for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: subgroup analyses from WASIDS E Kasner, M J Lynn, M I Chimowitz, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (51-60 of 59) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 59 results.
JAMA|February 23, 1990
Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study 4 years after surgery for myopia. Perk Study GroupG O Waring, M J Lynn, B Fielding, et al.
Refractive & Corneal Surgery|March 1, 1989
Symmetry of refractive and visual acuity outcome in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) studyM J Lynn, G O Waring, A Nizam, et al.
Ophthalmology|August 1, 1991
Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study five years after surgery. The Perk Study GroupG O Waring, M J Lynn, A Nizam, et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology|February 15, 1991
Stability of refraction during four years after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy studyG O Waring, M J Lynn, E R Strahlman, et al.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology|July 1, 1990
Three year results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) studyG O Waring, M J Lynn, W Culbertson, et al.
Ophthalmology|October 1, 1987
Three-year results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) StudyG O Waring, M J Lynn, W Culbertson, et al.
Neurology|March 21, 2009
Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stentingF Nahab, M J Lynn, S E Kasner, et al.
Ophthalmology|February 1, 1985
Results of the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study one year after surgeryG O Waring, M J Lynn, H Gelender, et al.
Neurology|October 13, 2006
Warfarin vs aspirin for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: subgroup analyses from WASIDS E Kasner, M J Lynn, M I Chimowitz, et al.
Pageof 6