Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

M Orleans

Showing results (1-10 of 34) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)|January 1, 1985
Lessons from the Dublin study of electronic fetal monitoringM Orleans
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|May 1, 1995
Flawed research does not permit valid inferences about Cu-7 intrauterine contraceptive deviceM Orleans
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care|July 17, 1999
Assessing reproductive technology. A commentaryM Orleans, E Hemminki
Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|May 10, 1987
Are there health risks in using risking systems? The case of perinatal risk assessmentM Orleans, A D Haverkamp
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)|February 3, 2000
Low-birthweight prevention programs: the enigma of failureC Stevens-Simon, M Orleans
Women & Health|January 1, 1982
An assessment of electronic fetal monitoringA D Haverkamp, M Orleans
Obstetrics and Gynecology|February 1, 1997
Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomyS F Meikle, E W Nugent, M Orleans
Nursing Research|November 1, 1979
Electronic fetal monitoring: implications for obstetrical nursingJ Applegate, A D Haverkamp, M Orleans, et al.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|August 15, 1998
Rehospitalizations and outpatient contacts of mothers and neonates after hospital discharge after vaginal deliveryS F Meikle, E Lyons, P Hulac, et al.
American Journal of Perinatology|January 1, 1992
Fetal gender differences in preterm birth: findings in a North American cohortJ A McGregor, M Leff, M Orleans, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (1-10 of 34) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)|January 1, 1985
Lessons from the Dublin study of electronic fetal monitoringM Orleans
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|May 1, 1995
Flawed research does not permit valid inferences about Cu-7 intrauterine contraceptive deviceM Orleans
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care|July 17, 1999
Assessing reproductive technology. A commentaryM Orleans, E Hemminki
Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)|May 10, 1987
Are there health risks in using risking systems? The case of perinatal risk assessmentM Orleans, A D Haverkamp
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)|February 3, 2000
Low-birthweight prevention programs: the enigma of failureC Stevens-Simon, M Orleans
Women & Health|January 1, 1982
An assessment of electronic fetal monitoringA D Haverkamp, M Orleans
Obstetrics and Gynecology|February 1, 1997
Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomyS F Meikle, E W Nugent, M Orleans
Nursing Research|November 1, 1979
Electronic fetal monitoring: implications for obstetrical nursingJ Applegate, A D Haverkamp, M Orleans, et al.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|August 15, 1998
Rehospitalizations and outpatient contacts of mothers and neonates after hospital discharge after vaginal deliveryS F Meikle, E Lyons, P Hulac, et al.
American Journal of Perinatology|January 1, 1992
Fetal gender differences in preterm birth: findings in a North American cohortJ A McGregor, M Leff, M Orleans, et al.
Pageof 4