Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Mark Helfand

Showing results (91-100 of 105) with videos related to

Pageof 11
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|January 7, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceHoward Balshem, Mark Helfand, Holger J Schünemann, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|December 19, 2012
Challenges in the development and reimbursement of personalized medicine-payer and manufacturer perspectives and implications for health economics and outcomes research: a report of the ISPOR personalized medicine special interest groupEric Faulkner, Lieven Annemans, Lou Garrison, et al.
Clinical and Translational Science|June 29, 2011
A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness researchMark Helfand, Sean Tunis, Evelyn P Whitlock, et al.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association|May 24, 2016
Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening TestReinier G S Meester, Ann G Zauber, Chyke A Doubeni, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 7, 2012
GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidenceMassimo Brunetti, Ian Shemilt, Silvia Pregno, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 22, 2012
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomesGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Nancy Santesso, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 2, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistencyGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 23, 2021
Improving the utility of evidence synthesis for decision makers in the face of insufficient evidenceM Hassan Murad, Stephanie M Chang, Celia V Fiordalisi, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 2, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectnessGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 11, 2019
GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendationsHolger J Schünemann, Reem A Mustafa, Jan Brozek, et al.
Pageof 11

Showing results (91-100 of 105) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 11
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|January 7, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceHoward Balshem, Mark Helfand, Holger J Schünemann, et al.
Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research|December 19, 2012
Challenges in the development and reimbursement of personalized medicine-payer and manufacturer perspectives and implications for health economics and outcomes research: a report of the ISPOR personalized medicine special interest groupEric Faulkner, Lieven Annemans, Lou Garrison, et al.
Clinical and Translational Science|June 29, 2011
A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness researchMark Helfand, Sean Tunis, Evelyn P Whitlock, et al.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association|May 24, 2016
Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening TestReinier G S Meester, Ann G Zauber, Chyke A Doubeni, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 7, 2012
GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidenceMassimo Brunetti, Ian Shemilt, Silvia Pregno, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 22, 2012
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomesGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Nancy Santesso, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 2, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistencyGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 23, 2021
Improving the utility of evidence synthesis for decision makers in the face of insufficient evidenceM Hassan Murad, Stephanie M Chang, Celia V Fiordalisi, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|August 2, 2011
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectnessGordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|February 11, 2019
GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendationsHolger J Schünemann, Reem A Mustafa, Jan Brozek, et al.
Pageof 11