Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Marlies van Lent

Showing results (1-10 of 5) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 28, 2014
Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptanceMarlies van Lent, Joanna IntHout, Henk Jan Out
Plos One|August 14, 2014
Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journalsMarlies van Lent, John Overbeke, Henk Jan Out
BMJ Open|October 2, 2015
Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort studyMarlies van Lent, Joanna IntHout, Henk Jan Out
BMC Medical Research Methodology|October 2, 2013
Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding sourceMarlies van Lent, John Overbeke, Henk J Out
BMC Medical Ethics|December 11, 2014
Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical reviewMarlies van Lent, Gerard A Rongen, Henk J Out
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 5) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 28, 2014
Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptanceMarlies van Lent, Joanna IntHout, Henk Jan Out
Plos One|August 14, 2014
Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journalsMarlies van Lent, John Overbeke, Henk Jan Out
BMJ Open|October 2, 2015
Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort studyMarlies van Lent, Joanna IntHout, Henk Jan Out
BMC Medical Research Methodology|October 2, 2013
Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding sourceMarlies van Lent, John Overbeke, Henk J Out
BMC Medical Ethics|December 11, 2014
Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical reviewMarlies van Lent, Gerard A Rongen, Henk J Out
Pageof 1