Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Martin J Yaffe

Showing results (31-40 of 176) with videos related to

Pageof 18
Sort By:
Medical Physics|August 5, 2016
Technical Note: Robust measurement of the slice-sensitivity profile in breast tomosynthesisAili K Maki, James G Mainprize, Martin J Yaffe
Medical Physics|March 19, 2009
Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetryAlbert H Tyson, Gordon E Mawdsley, Martin J Yaffe
Medical Physics|July 4, 2002
Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiencyJames G Mainprize, Dylan C Hunt, Martin J Yaffe
The Lancet. Oncology|November 5, 2020
Recommendations for breast cancer screeningMartin J Yaffe, Paula B Gordon, Michael N Linver
Medical Physics|August 17, 2012
The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammographyJames G Mainprize, Albert H Tyson, Martin J Yaffe
Journal of Breast Imaging|February 28, 2024
The Fundamental Flaws of the CNBSS Trials: A Scientific ReviewJean M Seely, Peter R Eby, Martin J Yaffe
Health Physics|October 14, 2008
Technical developments in mammographyMartin J Yaffe, James G Mainprize, Roberta A Jong
Medical Physics|December 13, 2006
Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age groupMartin J Yaffe, Gary T Barnes, Colin G Orton
Journal of Breast Imaging|March 1, 2024
Breast Cancer Screening: Beyond MortalityMartin J Yaffe, Roberta A Jong, Kathleen I Pritchard
Medical Physics|February 11, 2012
Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detectorDavid M Hunter, George Belev, Safa Kasap, et al.
Pageof 18

Showing results (31-40 of 176) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 18
Medical Physics|August 5, 2016
Technical Note: Robust measurement of the slice-sensitivity profile in breast tomosynthesisAili K Maki, James G Mainprize, Martin J Yaffe
Medical Physics|March 19, 2009
Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetryAlbert H Tyson, Gordon E Mawdsley, Martin J Yaffe
Medical Physics|July 4, 2002
Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiencyJames G Mainprize, Dylan C Hunt, Martin J Yaffe
The Lancet. Oncology|November 5, 2020
Recommendations for breast cancer screeningMartin J Yaffe, Paula B Gordon, Michael N Linver
Medical Physics|August 17, 2012
The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammographyJames G Mainprize, Albert H Tyson, Martin J Yaffe
Journal of Breast Imaging|February 28, 2024
The Fundamental Flaws of the CNBSS Trials: A Scientific ReviewJean M Seely, Peter R Eby, Martin J Yaffe
Health Physics|October 14, 2008
Technical developments in mammographyMartin J Yaffe, James G Mainprize, Roberta A Jong
Medical Physics|December 13, 2006
Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age groupMartin J Yaffe, Gary T Barnes, Colin G Orton
Journal of Breast Imaging|March 1, 2024
Breast Cancer Screening: Beyond MortalityMartin J Yaffe, Roberta A Jong, Kathleen I Pritchard
Medical Physics|February 11, 2012
Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detectorDavid M Hunter, George Belev, Safa Kasap, et al.
Pageof 18