Showing results (61-70 of 764) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 77
Urologic Oncology|April 12, 2011
Factors associated with downgrading in patients with high grade prostate cancerJared M Whitson, Sima P Porten, Janet E Cowan, et al.Current Urology Reports|May 22, 2014
Implications of the new AUA guidelines on prostate cancer detection in the U.SMatthew R CooperbergEuropean Urology|May 25, 2017
The New US Preventive Services Task Force "C" Draft Recommendation for Prostate Cancer ScreeningMatthew R CooperbergEuropean Urology|December 13, 2016
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer OutcomesMichael S Leapman, Janet E Cowan, Jeffry Simko, et al.European Urology Oncology|December 6, 2023
The Impact of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy on Recurrence Outcomes After Initial Active Surveillance: Results from a Large Institutional CohortKevin Shee, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, et al.Clinical Genitourinary Cancer|August 15, 2016
Validity of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score Derived From Targeted Biopsy: Modeling Evidence From Ultrasound Lesion-Directed BiopsyMichael S Leapman, Niloufar Ameli, Katsuto Shinohara, et al.European Urology Oncology|June 4, 2019
Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate CancerSelma Masic, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, et al.Investigative and Clinical Urology|January 4, 2022
Molecular risk classifier score and biochemical recurrence risk are associated with cribriform pattern type in Gleason 3+4=7 prostate cancerNancy Y Greenland, Matthew R Cooperberg, Anthony C Wong, et al.Plos One|October 11, 2017
Association between a 17-gene genomic prostate score and multi-parametric prostate MRI in men with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa)Michael S Leapman, Antonio C Westphalen, Niloufar Ameli, et al.Urology|February 1, 2003
How potent is potent? Evaluation of sexual function and bother in men who report potency after treatment for prostate cancer: data from CaPSUREMatthew R Cooperberg, Theresa M Koppie, Deborah P Lubeck, et al.Pageof 77