Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Michael P Speed

Showing results (1-10 of 36) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Animal Behaviour|February 15, 2001
Can receiver psychology explain the evolution of aposematism?Michael P. Speed
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|October 21, 2015
Antipredator defenses predict diversification ratesKevin Arbuckle, Michael P Speed
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society|March 3, 2016
Quantification provides a conceptual basis for convergent evolutionMichael P Speed, Kevin Arbuckle
Nature|January 22, 2005
Evolution: a taste for mimicryGraeme D Ruxton, Michael P Speed
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution|August 19, 2014
Antagonistic evolution in an aposematic predator-prey signaling systemMichael P Speed, Daniel W Franks
Journal of Theoretical Biology|September 1, 2010
The effect of metapopulation dynamics on the survival and spread of a novel, conspicuous preyThomas J Lee, Michael P Speed
Proceedings. Biological Sciences|March 1, 2005
Aposematism: what should our starting point be?Michael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton
Proceedings. Biological Sciences|March 18, 2006
How can automimicry persist when predators can preferentially consume undefended mimics?Graeme D Ruxton, Michael P Speed
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution|March 14, 2007
How bright and how nasty: explaining diversity in warning signal strengthMichael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton
The American Naturalist|May 26, 2010
Imperfect Batesian mimicry and the conspicuousness costs of mimetic resemblanceMichael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton
Pageof 4

Showing results (1-10 of 36) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Animal Behaviour|February 15, 2001
Can receiver psychology explain the evolution of aposematism?Michael P. Speed
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|October 21, 2015
Antipredator defenses predict diversification ratesKevin Arbuckle, Michael P Speed
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society|March 3, 2016
Quantification provides a conceptual basis for convergent evolutionMichael P Speed, Kevin Arbuckle
Nature|January 22, 2005
Evolution: a taste for mimicryGraeme D Ruxton, Michael P Speed
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution|August 19, 2014
Antagonistic evolution in an aposematic predator-prey signaling systemMichael P Speed, Daniel W Franks
Journal of Theoretical Biology|September 1, 2010
The effect of metapopulation dynamics on the survival and spread of a novel, conspicuous preyThomas J Lee, Michael P Speed
Proceedings. Biological Sciences|March 1, 2005
Aposematism: what should our starting point be?Michael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton
Proceedings. Biological Sciences|March 18, 2006
How can automimicry persist when predators can preferentially consume undefended mimics?Graeme D Ruxton, Michael P Speed
Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution|March 14, 2007
How bright and how nasty: explaining diversity in warning signal strengthMichael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton
The American Naturalist|May 26, 2010
Imperfect Batesian mimicry and the conspicuousness costs of mimetic resemblanceMichael P Speed, Graeme D Ruxton
Pageof 4