Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Miriam Kuppermann

Showing results (1-10 of 166) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
Maternal and Child Health Journal|October 6, 2007
Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural LatinasCourtney Griffiths, Miriam Kuppermann
Obstetrics and Gynecology|January 9, 2015
Identifying a "range of reasonable options" for cervical cancer screeningGeorge F Sawaya, Miriam Kuppermann
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation|February 16, 2005
Prenatal testing guidelines: time for a new approachMiriam Kuppermann, Mary E Norton
Seminars in Perinatology|September 28, 2010
Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: approach to delivery after cesareanAnjali J Kaimal, Miriam Kuppermann
JAMA|January 14, 2015
Decision-support guide and use of prenatal genetic testing--replyMiriam Kuppermann, Mary E Norton
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|October 30, 2016
Women should decide which conditions matterMary E Norton, Miriam Kuppermann
Seminars in Perinatology|September 27, 2012
Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferencesAnjali J Kaimal, Miriam Kuppermann
JAMA Internal Medicine|December 2, 2014
Shared decision-making: easy to evoke, challenging to implementMiriam Kuppermann, George F Sawaya
Health Economics|September 26, 2003
Conservative versus aggressive follow up of mildly abnormal Pap smears: testing for process utilityStephen Birch, Joy Melnikow, Miriam Kuppermann
Maternal and Child Health Journal|November 8, 2011
Attitudes toward birth spacing among low-income, postpartum women: a qualitative analysisAllison Bryant, Ana Fernandez-Lamothe, Miriam Kuppermann
Pageof 17

Showing results (1-10 of 166) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
Maternal and Child Health Journal|October 6, 2007
Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural LatinasCourtney Griffiths, Miriam Kuppermann
Obstetrics and Gynecology|January 9, 2015
Identifying a "range of reasonable options" for cervical cancer screeningGeorge F Sawaya, Miriam Kuppermann
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation|February 16, 2005
Prenatal testing guidelines: time for a new approachMiriam Kuppermann, Mary E Norton
Seminars in Perinatology|September 28, 2010
Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: approach to delivery after cesareanAnjali J Kaimal, Miriam Kuppermann
JAMA|January 14, 2015
Decision-support guide and use of prenatal genetic testing--replyMiriam Kuppermann, Mary E Norton
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|October 30, 2016
Women should decide which conditions matterMary E Norton, Miriam Kuppermann
Seminars in Perinatology|September 27, 2012
Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferencesAnjali J Kaimal, Miriam Kuppermann
JAMA Internal Medicine|December 2, 2014
Shared decision-making: easy to evoke, challenging to implementMiriam Kuppermann, George F Sawaya
Health Economics|September 26, 2003
Conservative versus aggressive follow up of mildly abnormal Pap smears: testing for process utilityStephen Birch, Joy Melnikow, Miriam Kuppermann
Maternal and Child Health Journal|November 8, 2011
Attitudes toward birth spacing among low-income, postpartum women: a qualitative analysisAllison Bryant, Ana Fernandez-Lamothe, Miriam Kuppermann
Pageof 17