Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Mitchell J Nathan

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence|March 20, 2023
Disembodied AI and the limits to machine understanding of students' embodied interactionsMitchell J Nathan
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications|February 21, 2017
Grounded and embodied mathematical cognition: Promoting mathematical insight and proof using action and languageMitchell J Nathan, Candace Walkington
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science|August 15, 2015
Learning sciencesMitchell J Nathan, Martha Wagner Alibali
Cognitive Science|August 29, 2022
The Effect of Cognitive Relevance of Directed Actions on Mathematical ReasoningCandace Walkington, Mitchell J Nathan, Min Wang, et al.
Cognitive Science|June 4, 2011
Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: evidence from algebra problem solvingKenneth R Koedinger, Martha W Alibali, Mitchell J Nathan
Cognitive Science|March 21, 2025
Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric ReasoningFangli Xia, Mitchell J Nathan, Kelsey E Schenck, et al.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications|November 7, 2017
Teachers' gestures and students' learning: sometimes "hands off" is betterAmelia Yeo, Iasmine Ledesma, Mitchell J Nathan, et al.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest : a Journal of the American Psychological Society|July 15, 2015
Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational PsychologyJohn Dunlosky, Katherine A Rawson, Elizabeth J Marsh, et al.
Research Evaluation|May 2, 2017
'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer reviewElizabeth L Pier, Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|March 7, 2018
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applicationsElizabeth L Pier, Markus Brauer, Amarette Filut, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence|March 20, 2023
Disembodied AI and the limits to machine understanding of students' embodied interactionsMitchell J Nathan
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications|February 21, 2017
Grounded and embodied mathematical cognition: Promoting mathematical insight and proof using action and languageMitchell J Nathan, Candace Walkington
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science|August 15, 2015
Learning sciencesMitchell J Nathan, Martha Wagner Alibali
Cognitive Science|August 29, 2022
The Effect of Cognitive Relevance of Directed Actions on Mathematical ReasoningCandace Walkington, Mitchell J Nathan, Min Wang, et al.
Cognitive Science|June 4, 2011
Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: evidence from algebra problem solvingKenneth R Koedinger, Martha W Alibali, Mitchell J Nathan
Cognitive Science|March 21, 2025
Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric ReasoningFangli Xia, Mitchell J Nathan, Kelsey E Schenck, et al.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications|November 7, 2017
Teachers' gestures and students' learning: sometimes "hands off" is betterAmelia Yeo, Iasmine Ledesma, Mitchell J Nathan, et al.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest : a Journal of the American Psychological Society|July 15, 2015
Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational PsychologyJohn Dunlosky, Katherine A Rawson, Elizabeth J Marsh, et al.
Research Evaluation|May 2, 2017
'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer reviewElizabeth L Pier, Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|March 7, 2018
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applicationsElizabeth L Pier, Markus Brauer, Amarette Filut, et al.
Pageof 1