Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

N Warr

Showing results (31-40 of 51) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Physical Review Letters|May 16, 2007
Coulomb excitation of 68,70Cu: first use of postaccelerated isomeric beamsI Stefanescu, G Georgiev, F Ames, et al.
Nature Communications|October 10, 2020
Publisher Correction: The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nucleiP A Butler, L P Gaffney, P Spagnoletti, et al.
Physical Review Letters|February 21, 2025
Revealing the Nature of yrast States in Neutron-Rich Polonium IsotopesR Lică, A N Andreyev, H Naïdja, et al.
Nature Communications|June 8, 2019
The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nucleiP A Butler, L P Gaffney, P Spagnoletti, et al.
Physical Review Letters|October 20, 2018
First Accurate Normalization of the β-delayed α Decay of ^{16}N and Implications for the ^{12}C(α,γ)^{16}O Astrophysical Reaction RateO S Kirsebom, O Tengblad, R Lica, et al.
Physical Review Letters|July 9, 2019
Improved Value for the Gamow-Teller Strength of the ^{100}Sn Beta DecayD Lubos, J Park, T Faestermann, et al.
Physical Review Letters|July 28, 2023
^{133}In: A Rosetta Stone for Decays of r-Process NucleiZ Y Xu, M Madurga, R Grzywacz, et al.
Physical Review Letters|November 24, 2011
16+ spin-gap isomer in 96CdB S Nara Singh, Z Liu, R Wadsworth, et al.
Physical Review Letters|September 10, 2016
Erratum: Spectroscopic Quadrupole Moments in ^{96,98}Sr: Evidence for Shape Coexistence in Neutron-Rich Strontium Isotopes at N=60 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 022701 (2016)]E Clément, M Zielińska, A Görgen, et al.
Physical Review Letters|January 30, 2016
Spectroscopic Quadrupole Moments in {96,98}Sr: Evidence for Shape Coexistence in Neutron-Rich Strontium Isotopes at N=60E Clément, M Zielińska, A Görgen, et al.
Pageof 6

Showing results (31-40 of 51) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Physical Review Letters|May 16, 2007
Coulomb excitation of 68,70Cu: first use of postaccelerated isomeric beamsI Stefanescu, G Georgiev, F Ames, et al.
Nature Communications|October 10, 2020
Publisher Correction: The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nucleiP A Butler, L P Gaffney, P Spagnoletti, et al.
Physical Review Letters|February 21, 2025
Revealing the Nature of yrast States in Neutron-Rich Polonium IsotopesR Lică, A N Andreyev, H Naïdja, et al.
Nature Communications|June 8, 2019
The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nucleiP A Butler, L P Gaffney, P Spagnoletti, et al.
Physical Review Letters|October 20, 2018
First Accurate Normalization of the β-delayed α Decay of ^{16}N and Implications for the ^{12}C(α,γ)^{16}O Astrophysical Reaction RateO S Kirsebom, O Tengblad, R Lica, et al.
Physical Review Letters|July 9, 2019
Improved Value for the Gamow-Teller Strength of the ^{100}Sn Beta DecayD Lubos, J Park, T Faestermann, et al.
Physical Review Letters|July 28, 2023
^{133}In: A Rosetta Stone for Decays of r-Process NucleiZ Y Xu, M Madurga, R Grzywacz, et al.
Physical Review Letters|November 24, 2011
16+ spin-gap isomer in 96CdB S Nara Singh, Z Liu, R Wadsworth, et al.
Physical Review Letters|September 10, 2016
Erratum: Spectroscopic Quadrupole Moments in ^{96,98}Sr: Evidence for Shape Coexistence in Neutron-Rich Strontium Isotopes at N=60 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 022701 (2016)]E Clément, M Zielińska, A Görgen, et al.
Physical Review Letters|January 30, 2016
Spectroscopic Quadrupole Moments in {96,98}Sr: Evidence for Shape Coexistence in Neutron-Rich Strontium Isotopes at N=60E Clément, M Zielińska, A Görgen, et al.
Pageof 6