Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Nicholas Scurich

Showing results (1-10 of 52) with videos related to

Pageof 6
Sort By:
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|November 25, 2020
Introduction to this special issue: Underreporting of sexual abuseNicholas Scurich
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|October 6, 2018
The case against categorical risk estimatesNicholas Scurich
Journal of Law and the Biosciences|May 1, 2018
What do experimental simulations tell us about the effect of neuro/genetic evidence on jurors?Nicholas Scurich
Journal of Law and the Biosciences|May 31, 2016
The Blunt-Edged Sword: Genetic Explanations of Misbehavior Neither Mitigate Nor Aggravate PunishmentNicholas Scurich, Paul Appelbaum
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 21, 2023
Commentary on: Monson KL, Smith ED, Peters EM. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners. J forensic sci. 2022; 68(1):86-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152Nicholas Scurich, Hal Stern
Law and Human Behavior|September 22, 2015
Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivismNicholas Scurich, John Monahan
Plos One|September 11, 2014
The selective allure of neuroscientific explanationsNicholas Scurich, Adam Shniderman
Law and Human Behavior|August 18, 2017
On informing jurors of potential sanctionsJennifer Teitcher, Nicholas Scurich
Law and Human Behavior|May 6, 2016
The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidenceRachel Greenspan, Nicholas Scurich
Law and Human Behavior|July 17, 2013
Mock jurors' use of error rates in DNA database trawlsNicholas Scurich, Richard S John
Pageof 6

Showing results (1-10 of 52) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 6
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|November 25, 2020
Introduction to this special issue: Underreporting of sexual abuseNicholas Scurich
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|October 6, 2018
The case against categorical risk estimatesNicholas Scurich
Journal of Law and the Biosciences|May 1, 2018
What do experimental simulations tell us about the effect of neuro/genetic evidence on jurors?Nicholas Scurich
Journal of Law and the Biosciences|May 31, 2016
The Blunt-Edged Sword: Genetic Explanations of Misbehavior Neither Mitigate Nor Aggravate PunishmentNicholas Scurich, Paul Appelbaum
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 21, 2023
Commentary on: Monson KL, Smith ED, Peters EM. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners. J forensic sci. 2022; 68(1):86-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15152Nicholas Scurich, Hal Stern
Law and Human Behavior|September 22, 2015
Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivismNicholas Scurich, John Monahan
Plos One|September 11, 2014
The selective allure of neuroscientific explanationsNicholas Scurich, Adam Shniderman
Law and Human Behavior|August 18, 2017
On informing jurors of potential sanctionsJennifer Teitcher, Nicholas Scurich
Law and Human Behavior|May 6, 2016
The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidenceRachel Greenspan, Nicholas Scurich
Law and Human Behavior|July 17, 2013
Mock jurors' use of error rates in DNA database trawlsNicholas Scurich, Richard S John
Pageof 6