Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Paola Clauser

Showing results (61-70 of 144) with videos related to

Pageof 15
Sort By:
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)|April 1, 2020
External Validation of a Risk Stratification Score for B3 Breast Lesions Detected at Ultrasound Core Needle BiopsyCristina Grippo, Pooja Jagmohan, Paola Clauser, et al.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI|February 16, 2020
Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility StudyPaola Clauser, Pascal A T Baltzer, Panagiotis Kapetas, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|June 3, 2019
Intra- and inter-observer variability in dependence of T1-time correction for common dynamic contrast enhanced MRI parameters in prostate cancer patientsMichaela Daniel, Stephan H Polanec, Georg Wengert, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|January 24, 2024
A spiculated mass target model for clinical image quality control in digital mammographyElisabeth Salomon, Bence Vanko, Peter Homolka, et al.
European Radiology|June 7, 2020
The Kaiser score reliably excludes malignancy in benign contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI high-risk screening examsRuxandra Iulia Milos, Francesca Pipan, Anastasia Kalovidouri, et al.
Insights Into Imaging|June 12, 2025
Cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced breast MRI in suspicious mammographic microcalcificationsBarbara J Fueger, Fabian Tollens, Clemens G N Kaiser, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|September 20, 2024
Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with regards to reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy as well as possible significance of pre - and post - contrast acquisition and employment of different b valuesRaoul Varga, Barbara J Fueger, Francesca Ferrara, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|November 16, 2016
Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcificationsPaola Clauser, Georg Nagl, Thomas H Helbich, et al.
European Radiology Experimental|August 21, 2022
The potential of predictive and prognostic breast MRI (P2-bMRI)Matthias Dietzel, Rubina Manuela Trimboli, Moreno Zanardo, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 12, 2026
A systematic comparison of abbreviated and unenhanced breast MRI protocols in women with mammographically dense breasts compared to full multiparametric breast MR imagingPhilipp Widmayer, Erika Ferrari-Kanzler, Sebastian P Haider, et al.
Pageof 15

Showing results (61-70 of 144) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 15
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)|April 1, 2020
External Validation of a Risk Stratification Score for B3 Breast Lesions Detected at Ultrasound Core Needle BiopsyCristina Grippo, Pooja Jagmohan, Paola Clauser, et al.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI|February 16, 2020
Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility StudyPaola Clauser, Pascal A T Baltzer, Panagiotis Kapetas, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|June 3, 2019
Intra- and inter-observer variability in dependence of T1-time correction for common dynamic contrast enhanced MRI parameters in prostate cancer patientsMichaela Daniel, Stephan H Polanec, Georg Wengert, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|January 24, 2024
A spiculated mass target model for clinical image quality control in digital mammographyElisabeth Salomon, Bence Vanko, Peter Homolka, et al.
European Radiology|June 7, 2020
The Kaiser score reliably excludes malignancy in benign contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI high-risk screening examsRuxandra Iulia Milos, Francesca Pipan, Anastasia Kalovidouri, et al.
Insights Into Imaging|June 12, 2025
Cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced breast MRI in suspicious mammographic microcalcificationsBarbara J Fueger, Fabian Tollens, Clemens G N Kaiser, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|September 20, 2024
Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with regards to reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy as well as possible significance of pre - and post - contrast acquisition and employment of different b valuesRaoul Varga, Barbara J Fueger, Francesca Ferrara, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|November 16, 2016
Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcificationsPaola Clauser, Georg Nagl, Thomas H Helbich, et al.
European Radiology Experimental|August 21, 2022
The potential of predictive and prognostic breast MRI (P2-bMRI)Matthias Dietzel, Rubina Manuela Trimboli, Moreno Zanardo, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|April 12, 2026
A systematic comparison of abbreviated and unenhanced breast MRI protocols in women with mammographically dense breasts compared to full multiparametric breast MR imagingPhilipp Widmayer, Erika Ferrari-Kanzler, Sebastian P Haider, et al.
Pageof 15