Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Pascal A T Baltzer

Showing results (51-60 of 164) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
European Radiology|November 26, 2009
Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesionsPascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, Matthias Dietzel, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging|November 11, 2017
Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?Pascal A T Baltzer, Barbara Bennani-Baiti, Alexander Stöttinger, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|May 3, 2025
Impact of Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) on diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for breast cancer diagnosisSonja Bechyna, Ambra Santonocito, Nina Pötsch, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|January 23, 2010
The hook sign for differential diagnosis of malignant from benign lesions in magnetic resonance mammography: experience in a study of 1084 histologically verified casesMatthias Dietzel, Pascal A T Baltzer, Tibor Vag, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|July 12, 2025
Response to comments regarding our study on BPE in CEM "No, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is a problem in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)"Sonja Bechyna, Ambra Santonocito, Nina Pötsch, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|March 21, 2021
Correct determination of the enhancement curve is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis using the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for breast MRICristina Grippo, Pooja Jagmohan, Thomas H Helbich, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|August 17, 2010
Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classesMatthias Benndorf, Pascal A T Baltzer, Tibor Vag, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|February 22, 2021
Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysisBarbara J Fueger, Paola Clauser, Panagiotis Kapetas, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 22, 2010
False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor studyPascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, Matthias Dietzel, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|October 20, 2024
MRI-only breast cancers are less aggressive than cancers identifiable on conventional imagingMelis Baykara Ulusan, Francesca Ferrara, Emine Meltem, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (51-60 of 164) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
European Radiology|November 26, 2009
Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesionsPascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, Matthias Dietzel, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging|November 11, 2017
Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?Pascal A T Baltzer, Barbara Bennani-Baiti, Alexander Stöttinger, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|May 3, 2025
Impact of Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) on diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for breast cancer diagnosisSonja Bechyna, Ambra Santonocito, Nina Pötsch, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|January 23, 2010
The hook sign for differential diagnosis of malignant from benign lesions in magnetic resonance mammography: experience in a study of 1084 histologically verified casesMatthias Dietzel, Pascal A T Baltzer, Tibor Vag, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|July 12, 2025
Response to comments regarding our study on BPE in CEM "No, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is a problem in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)"Sonja Bechyna, Ambra Santonocito, Nina Pötsch, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|March 21, 2021
Correct determination of the enhancement curve is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis using the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for breast MRICristina Grippo, Pooja Jagmohan, Thomas H Helbich, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|August 17, 2010
Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classesMatthias Benndorf, Pascal A T Baltzer, Tibor Vag, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|February 22, 2021
Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysisBarbara J Fueger, Paola Clauser, Panagiotis Kapetas, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 22, 2010
False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor studyPascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, Matthias Dietzel, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|October 20, 2024
MRI-only breast cancers are less aggressive than cancers identifiable on conventional imagingMelis Baykara Ulusan, Francesca Ferrara, Emine Meltem, et al.
Pageof 17