Showing results (31-40 of 86) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 9
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery|February 1, 2002
Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysisMark Packer, I Howard Fine, Richard S Hoffman, et al.Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery|March 16, 2005
The physics of phaco: a reviewMark Packer, William J Fishkind, I Howard Fine, et al.Journal of Glaucoma|August 28, 2012
Minimally invasive external mini-glaucoma shunt implantation without conjunctival dissectionRichard S Hoffman, Alan S Crandall, David A Crandall, et al.Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery|June 13, 2006
Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trialJ Stuart Cumming, D Michael Colvard, Steven J Dell, et al.Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO|April 27, 2007
Comparison of surgically induced astigmatisms after clear corneal incisions of different sizesSung Chur Moon, Tarek Mohamed, I Howard FineClinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)|December 13, 2022
The EVO ICL for Moderate Myopia: Results from the US FDA Clinical TrialMark PackerJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery|May 12, 2010
Effect of intraoperative aberrometry on the rate of postoperative enhancement: retrospective studyMark PackerClinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)|June 30, 2016
Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lensMark PackerClinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)|June 1, 2022
Evaluation of the EVO/EVO+ Sphere and Toric Visian ICL: Six Month Results from the United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical TrialMark PackerClinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)|December 21, 2018
The Implantable Collamer Lens with a central port: review of the literatureMark PackerPageof 9