Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Rik H Koekenbier

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|May 23, 2008
Online-mediated syphilis testing: feasibility, efficacy, and usageRik H Koekenbier, Udi Davidovich, Edwin J M van Leent, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|November 29, 2016
Young Low-Risk Heterosexual Clients Prefer a Chlamydia Home Collection Test to a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Visit in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, A Cross-Sectional StudyMartijn S van Rooijen, Rik H Koekenbier, Alfons Hendriks, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|January 13, 2018
What Is the Optimal Time to Retest Patients With a Urogenital Chlamydia Infection? A Randomized Controlled TrialJannie J van der Helm, Rik H Koekenbier, Martijn S van Rooijen, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Infections|June 26, 2012
High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infectionsHannelore M Götz, Ingrid V F van den Broek, Christian J P A Hoebe, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Infections|January 5, 2012
Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effectiveIngrid V F van den Broek, Elfi E H G Brouwers, Hannelore M Götz, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|October 8, 2010
Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the NetherlandsJan E A M van Bergen, Johannes S A Fennema, Ingrid V F van den Broek, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|January 18, 2012
Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivityEline L M Op de Coul, Hannelore M Götz, Jan E A M van Bergen, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|April 9, 2010
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysisIngrid V F van den Broek, Christian J P A Hoebe, Jan E A M van Bergen, et al.
BMC Public Health|March 13, 2012
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the NetherlandsNynke F B Dokkum, Rik H Koekenbier, Ingrid V F van den Broek, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|January 11, 2011
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponseKatie E Greenland, Eline L M Op de Coul, Jan E A M van Bergen, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|May 23, 2008
Online-mediated syphilis testing: feasibility, efficacy, and usageRik H Koekenbier, Udi Davidovich, Edwin J M van Leent, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|November 29, 2016
Young Low-Risk Heterosexual Clients Prefer a Chlamydia Home Collection Test to a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Visit in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, A Cross-Sectional StudyMartijn S van Rooijen, Rik H Koekenbier, Alfons Hendriks, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|January 13, 2018
What Is the Optimal Time to Retest Patients With a Urogenital Chlamydia Infection? A Randomized Controlled TrialJannie J van der Helm, Rik H Koekenbier, Martijn S van Rooijen, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Infections|June 26, 2012
High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infectionsHannelore M Götz, Ingrid V F van den Broek, Christian J P A Hoebe, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Infections|January 5, 2012
Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effectiveIngrid V F van den Broek, Elfi E H G Brouwers, Hannelore M Götz, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|October 8, 2010
Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the NetherlandsJan E A M van Bergen, Johannes S A Fennema, Ingrid V F van den Broek, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|January 18, 2012
Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivityEline L M Op de Coul, Hannelore M Götz, Jan E A M van Bergen, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|April 9, 2010
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysisIngrid V F van den Broek, Christian J P A Hoebe, Jan E A M van Bergen, et al.
BMC Public Health|March 13, 2012
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the NetherlandsNynke F B Dokkum, Rik H Koekenbier, Ingrid V F van den Broek, et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases|January 11, 2011
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponseKatie E Greenland, Eline L M Op de Coul, Jan E A M van Bergen, et al.
Pageof 2