Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Robbie C M van Aert

Showing results (21-30 of 35) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Psychological Methods|November 30, 2018
The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneityHilde E M Augusteijn, Robbie C M van Aert, Marcel A L M van Assen
Psychosomatic Medicine|May 24, 2024
Affective Responses to Acute Exercise: A Meta-Analysis of the Potential Beneficial Effects of a Single Bout of Exercise on General Mood, Anxiety, and Depressive SymptomsAli A Weinstein, Robbie C M van Aert, Kiersten Donovan, et al.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|February 18, 2021
The role of meta-analysis and preregistration in assessing the evidence for cleansing effectsRobert M Ross, Robbie C M van Aert, Olmo R van den Akker, et al.
Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift|March 19, 2025
A New Frequentist Implementation of the Daniels and Hughes Bivariate Meta-Analysis Model for Surrogate Endpoint EvaluationDan Jackson, Michael Sweeting, Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
Plos One|January 28, 2014
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant resultsMarcel A L M van Assen, Robbie C M van Aert, Michèle B Nuijten, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|February 6, 2014
Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer researchMichèle B Nuijten, Marcel A L M van Assen, Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|May 11, 2020
Longitudinal associations of psychological resilience with mental health and functioning among military personnel: A meta-analysis of prospective studiesErik van der Meulen, Peter G van der Velden, Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|July 3, 2026
Cross-cultural generalizability is an empirical questionShawn K S Chan, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, Michael Schaerer, et al.
Peerj|April 15, 2016
Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?Chris H J Hartgerink, Robbie C M van Aert, Michèle B Nuijten, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology|December 10, 2016
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid <i>p</i>-HackingJelte M Wicherts, Coosje L S Veldkamp, Hilde E M Augusteijn, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (21-30 of 35) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Psychological Methods|November 30, 2018
The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneityHilde E M Augusteijn, Robbie C M van Aert, Marcel A L M van Assen
Psychosomatic Medicine|May 24, 2024
Affective Responses to Acute Exercise: A Meta-Analysis of the Potential Beneficial Effects of a Single Bout of Exercise on General Mood, Anxiety, and Depressive SymptomsAli A Weinstein, Robbie C M van Aert, Kiersten Donovan, et al.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|February 18, 2021
The role of meta-analysis and preregistration in assessing the evidence for cleansing effectsRobert M Ross, Robbie C M van Aert, Olmo R van den Akker, et al.
Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift|March 19, 2025
A New Frequentist Implementation of the Daniels and Hughes Bivariate Meta-Analysis Model for Surrogate Endpoint EvaluationDan Jackson, Michael Sweeting, Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
Plos One|January 28, 2014
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant resultsMarcel A L M van Assen, Robbie C M van Aert, Michèle B Nuijten, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|February 6, 2014
Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer researchMichèle B Nuijten, Marcel A L M van Assen, Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|May 11, 2020
Longitudinal associations of psychological resilience with mental health and functioning among military personnel: A meta-analysis of prospective studiesErik van der Meulen, Peter G van der Velden, Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|July 3, 2026
Cross-cultural generalizability is an empirical questionShawn K S Chan, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, Michael Schaerer, et al.
Peerj|April 15, 2016
Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?Chris H J Hartgerink, Robbie C M van Aert, Michèle B Nuijten, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology|December 10, 2016
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid <i>p</i>-HackingJelte M Wicherts, Coosje L S Veldkamp, Hilde E M Augusteijn, et al.
Pageof 4