Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Sarah L Gorst

Showing results (11-20 of 30) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Plos One|December 29, 2018
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchElizabeth Gargon, Sarah L Gorst, Nicola L Harman, et al.
Plos One|January 20, 2016
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User SurveySarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 27, 2025
Adverse events are considered but not always explicitly selected as core outcomes in research: an updated systematic reviewSarah L Gorst, Jonathan P Lucas, Susanna Dodd, et al.
Research Involvement and Engagement|May 12, 2020
Ensuring young voices are heard in core outcome set development: international workshops with 70 children and young peopleFrances C Sherratt, Heather Bagley, Simon R Stones, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 30, 2020
Methods used in the selection of instruments for outcomes included in core outcome sets have improved since the publication of the COSMIN/COMET guidelineSarah L Gorst, Cecilia A C Prinsen, Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, et al.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research|March 2, 2016
Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness researchSean R Tunis, Mike Clarke, Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 10, 2021
Patient-reported outcome measures in core outcome sets targeted overlapping domains but through different instrumentsOriana Ciani, Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, Michela Meregaglia, et al.
BMC Surgery|October 11, 2025
Continuity of outcome assessment throughout the lifecycle of surgical research: mapping core outcome domains measured in early phase and late phase studiesChristin Hoffmann, Emma Sewart, Susanna Dodd, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis|June 15, 2026
Toward a definition of a core outcome set in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a scoping review protocolCristian E Navarro, María Isabel Zuluaga, Sarah L Gorst, et al.
BMJ Medicine|March 20, 2023
Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysisIan J Saldanha, Susanna Dodd, Rebecca Fish, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 30) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Plos One|December 29, 2018
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchElizabeth Gargon, Sarah L Gorst, Nicola L Harman, et al.
Plos One|January 20, 2016
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User SurveySarah L Gorst, Elizabeth Gargon, Mike Clarke, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 27, 2025
Adverse events are considered but not always explicitly selected as core outcomes in research: an updated systematic reviewSarah L Gorst, Jonathan P Lucas, Susanna Dodd, et al.
Research Involvement and Engagement|May 12, 2020
Ensuring young voices are heard in core outcome set development: international workshops with 70 children and young peopleFrances C Sherratt, Heather Bagley, Simon R Stones, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 30, 2020
Methods used in the selection of instruments for outcomes included in core outcome sets have improved since the publication of the COSMIN/COMET guidelineSarah L Gorst, Cecilia A C Prinsen, Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, et al.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research|March 2, 2016
Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness researchSean R Tunis, Mike Clarke, Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 10, 2021
Patient-reported outcome measures in core outcome sets targeted overlapping domains but through different instrumentsOriana Ciani, Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, Michela Meregaglia, et al.
BMC Surgery|October 11, 2025
Continuity of outcome assessment throughout the lifecycle of surgical research: mapping core outcome domains measured in early phase and late phase studiesChristin Hoffmann, Emma Sewart, Susanna Dodd, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis|June 15, 2026
Toward a definition of a core outcome set in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a scoping review protocolCristian E Navarro, María Isabel Zuluaga, Sarah L Gorst, et al.
BMJ Medicine|March 20, 2023
Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysisIan J Saldanha, Susanna Dodd, Rebecca Fish, et al.
Pageof 3