Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Sophia Zackrisson

Showing results (51-60 of 140) with videos related to

Pageof 14
Sort By:
European Radiology|May 5, 2023
False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening TrialKristin Johnson, Jakob Olinder, Aldana Rosso, et al.
European Radiology|March 25, 2016
Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classificationHanna Sartor, Kristina Lång, Aldana Rosso, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|March 28, 2016
Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trialsNehmat Houssami, Kristina Lång, Daniela Bernardi, et al.
BMC Cancer|January 1, 2020
Mammographic density is a potential predictive marker of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancerIda Skarping, Daniel Förnvik, Hanna Sartor, et al.
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)|October 16, 2020
Neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment response; tumor size evaluation through different conventional imaging modalities in the NeoDense studyIda Skarping, Daniel Förnvik, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, et al.
Radiology|April 7, 2021
Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening TrialKristin Johnson, Kristina Lång, Debra M Ikeda, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)|July 26, 2024
Estimation of the absorbed dose in simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis and mechanical imagingAnna Bjerkén, Hanna Tomic, Sophia Zackrisson, et al.
Scientific Reports|December 1, 2020
Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtypeLi Sturesdotter, Malte Sandsveden, Kristin Johnson, et al.
Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland|September 7, 2021
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of tumour and nodal stage in rectal cancer treated by primary surgery: a population-based studyCecilia Dahlbäck, Kevin Korsbakke, Thule Alshibiby Bergman, et al.
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)|March 11, 2021
Meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating breast cancer detection and interval cancer rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography population screeningNehmat Houssami, Sophia Zackrisson, Katrina Blazek, et al.
Pageof 14

Showing results (51-60 of 140) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 14
European Radiology|May 5, 2023
False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening TrialKristin Johnson, Jakob Olinder, Aldana Rosso, et al.
European Radiology|March 25, 2016
Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classificationHanna Sartor, Kristina Lång, Aldana Rosso, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|March 28, 2016
Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trialsNehmat Houssami, Kristina Lång, Daniela Bernardi, et al.
BMC Cancer|January 1, 2020
Mammographic density is a potential predictive marker of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancerIda Skarping, Daniel Förnvik, Hanna Sartor, et al.
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)|October 16, 2020
Neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment response; tumor size evaluation through different conventional imaging modalities in the NeoDense studyIda Skarping, Daniel Förnvik, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, et al.
Radiology|April 7, 2021
Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening TrialKristin Johnson, Kristina Lång, Debra M Ikeda, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)|July 26, 2024
Estimation of the absorbed dose in simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis and mechanical imagingAnna Bjerkén, Hanna Tomic, Sophia Zackrisson, et al.
Scientific Reports|December 1, 2020
Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtypeLi Sturesdotter, Malte Sandsveden, Kristin Johnson, et al.
Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland|September 7, 2021
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of tumour and nodal stage in rectal cancer treated by primary surgery: a population-based studyCecilia Dahlbäck, Kevin Korsbakke, Thule Alshibiby Bergman, et al.
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)|March 11, 2021
Meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating breast cancer detection and interval cancer rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography population screeningNehmat Houssami, Sophia Zackrisson, Katrina Blazek, et al.
Pageof 14