Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Steven N Goodman

Showing results (11-20 of 146) with videos related to

Pageof 15
Sort By:
Clinical Trials (London, England)|August 24, 2007
Rashomon revisited: two views of monitoring the Women's Health Initiative trialsSteven N Goodman
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 18, 2007
Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefitSteven N Goodman
Nature|January 12, 2018
A quality-control test for predatory journalsSteven N Goodman
Clinical Trials (London, England)|April 4, 2009
Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased viewSteven N Goodman
Biostatistics (Oxford, England)|September 27, 2013
Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literatureSteven N Goodman
Annals of Internal Medicine|January 27, 2015
Clinical trial data sharing: what do we do now?Steven N Goodman
Clinical Trials (London, England)|December 9, 2010
On making clinical trials possibleSteven N Goodman
Science (New York, N.Y.)|June 4, 2016
STATISTICS. Aligning statistical and scientific reasoningSteven N Goodman
Nature|December 6, 2018
How sure are you of your result? Put a number on itSteven N Goodman
Biostatistics (Oxford, England)|June 12, 2010
CommentarySteven N Goodman
Pageof 15

Showing results (11-20 of 146) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 15
Clinical Trials (London, England)|August 24, 2007
Rashomon revisited: two views of monitoring the Women's Health Initiative trialsSteven N Goodman
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 18, 2007
Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefitSteven N Goodman
Nature|January 12, 2018
A quality-control test for predatory journalsSteven N Goodman
Clinical Trials (London, England)|April 4, 2009
Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased viewSteven N Goodman
Biostatistics (Oxford, England)|September 27, 2013
Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literatureSteven N Goodman
Annals of Internal Medicine|January 27, 2015
Clinical trial data sharing: what do we do now?Steven N Goodman
Clinical Trials (London, England)|December 9, 2010
On making clinical trials possibleSteven N Goodman
Science (New York, N.Y.)|June 4, 2016
STATISTICS. Aligning statistical and scientific reasoningSteven N Goodman
Nature|December 6, 2018
How sure are you of your result? Put a number on itSteven N Goodman
Biostatistics (Oxford, England)|June 12, 2010
CommentarySteven N Goodman
Pageof 15