Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (1-10 of 33) with videos related to
Page
of 4
Sort By:
Hofstra Law Review
|
June 24, 2004
The contraception misconception: why prescription contraceptives should be covered by employer insurance plans
Jennifer N White
Hofstra Law Review
|
July 1, 1982
The Human Life Bill: personhood revisited, or Congress takes aim at Roe v. Wade
John G Ferreira
Hofstra Law Review
|
January 1, 1976
O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill
Jeffrey D Fields
Hofstra Law Review
|
March 26, 2003
Who is the parent in cloning?
N Elster
Hofstra Law Review
|
March 26, 2003
"Being human": cloning and the challenges for public policy
K H Rothenberg
Hofstra Law Review
|
July 1, 1997
A plea for the enforceability of gestational surrogacy contracts
D E Lascarides
Hofstra Law Review
|
September 30, 2005
Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life
M K Shah
Hofstra Law Review
|
April 1, 1987
Embryo transplant, parental conflict, and reproductive freedom: a prospective analysis of issues and arguments created by forthcoming technology
Michele N Coleman
Hofstra Law Review
|
April 1, 1976
Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights
Karen G Crockett, Miriam Hyman
Hofstra Law Review
|
July 1, 1978
Return to the cuckoo's nest: an examination of the National Commission report on psychosurgery
Steven C Spronz
Page
of 4
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (1-10 of 33) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 4
Hofstra Law Review
|
June 24, 2004
The contraception misconception: why prescription contraceptives should be covered by employer insurance plans
Jennifer N White
Hofstra Law Review
|
July 1, 1982
The Human Life Bill: personhood revisited, or Congress takes aim at Roe v. Wade
John G Ferreira
Hofstra Law Review
|
January 1, 1976
O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill
Jeffrey D Fields
Hofstra Law Review
|
March 26, 2003
Who is the parent in cloning?
N Elster
Hofstra Law Review
|
March 26, 2003
"Being human": cloning and the challenges for public policy
K H Rothenberg
Hofstra Law Review
|
July 1, 1997
A plea for the enforceability of gestational surrogacy contracts
D E Lascarides
Hofstra Law Review
|
September 30, 2005
Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life
M K Shah
Hofstra Law Review
|
April 1, 1987
Embryo transplant, parental conflict, and reproductive freedom: a prospective analysis of issues and arguments created by forthcoming technology
Michele N Coleman
Hofstra Law Review
|
April 1, 1976
Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights
Karen G Crockett, Miriam Hyman
Hofstra Law Review
|
July 1, 1978
Return to the cuckoo's nest: an examination of the National Commission report on psychosurgery
Steven C Spronz
Page
of 4