Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Psychological methods

Showing results (401-410 of 1,212) with videos related to

Pageof 122
Sort By:
Psychological Methods|March 11, 2009
Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studiesAdam R Hafdahl, Michelle A Williams
Psychological Methods|March 11, 2009
Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response timesRinke H Klein Entink, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, Lutz F Hornke, et al.
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2009
Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studiesScott M Hofer, Andrea M Piccinin
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2009
The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated dataHarris Cooper, Erika A Patall
Psychological Methods|December 17, 2008
Analysis of affective instability in ecological momentary assessment: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modelingSeungmin Jahng, Phillip K Wood, Timothy J Trull
Psychological Methods|December 13, 2006
Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioningLynne Steinberg, David Thissen
Psychological Methods|December 13, 2006
Random intercept item factor analysisAlbert Maydeu-Olivares, Donna L Coffman
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2010
Killeen's (2005) p rep coefficient: logical and mathematical problemsMichael Maraun, Stephanie Gabriel
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2010
Replication, p rep, and confidence intervals: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010)Geoff Cumming
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2010
Regarding p rep: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010)Ronald C Serlin
Pageof 122

Showing results (401-410 of 1,212) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 122
Psychological Methods|March 11, 2009
Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studiesAdam R Hafdahl, Michelle A Williams
Psychological Methods|March 11, 2009
Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response timesRinke H Klein Entink, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, Lutz F Hornke, et al.
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2009
Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studiesScott M Hofer, Andrea M Piccinin
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2009
The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated dataHarris Cooper, Erika A Patall
Psychological Methods|December 17, 2008
Analysis of affective instability in ecological momentary assessment: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modelingSeungmin Jahng, Phillip K Wood, Timothy J Trull
Psychological Methods|December 13, 2006
Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioningLynne Steinberg, David Thissen
Psychological Methods|December 13, 2006
Random intercept item factor analysisAlbert Maydeu-Olivares, Donna L Coffman
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2010
Killeen's (2005) p rep coefficient: logical and mathematical problemsMichael Maraun, Stephanie Gabriel
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2010
Replication, p rep, and confidence intervals: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010)Geoff Cumming
Psychological Methods|June 3, 2010
Regarding p rep: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010)Ronald C Serlin
Pageof 122