Showing results (21-30 of 209) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 21
Research Integrity and Peer Review|September 10, 2019
A 10-year follow up of publishing ethics in China: what is new and what is unchangedKatrina A Bramstedt, Jun Xu
Research Integrity and Peer Review|August 1, 2017
Concern noted: A descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed CentralMelissa Vaught, Diana C Jordan, Hilda Bastian
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviewsJennifer A Byrne
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Publication proportions for registered breast cancer trials: before and following the introduction of the ClinicalTrials.gov results databaseInnocent Gerald Asiimwe, Dickson Rumona
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Using democracy to award research funding: an observational studyAdrian G Barnett, Philip Clarke, Cedryck Vaquette, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolutionCharles W Fox, Arianne Y K Albert, Timothy H Vines
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015Daniël A Korevaar, Jérémie F Cohen, Johannes B Reitsma, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Percentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articlesStéphane Boyer, Takayoshi Ikeda, Marie-Caroline Lefort, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Improving the process of research ethics reviewStacey A Page, Jeffrey Nyeboer
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
The high costs of getting ethical and site-specific approvals for multi-centre researchAdrian G Barnett, Megan J Campbell, Carla Shield, et al.
Pageof 21