Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus
Published on: May 16, 2025
Teledermatology: an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study, Part II
Hon S Pak1, David Harden, David Cruess
1Department of Dermatology, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Dr, Bldg 3600, San Antonio, TX 78258, USA. hon.pak@amedd.army.mil
Insights
Teledermatology offers effective remote skin care, though diagnostic certainty is lower than in-person visits. Dermatologists using teledermatology recommended more biopsies, indicating careful evaluation for skin conditions.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Medical Informatics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Teledermatology is increasingly used for remote dermatologic consultations.
- Previous studies have explored diagnostic correlation but less on diagnostic certainty.
- This study, Part II, focuses on diagnostic certainty and biopsy recommendations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic certainty levels between teledermatology and traditional face-to-face dermatologic evaluations.
- To analyze biopsy recommendation rates in both teledermatology and in-person settings.
- To discuss factors influencing diagnostic certainty in teledermatology.
Main Methods:
- Intraobserver diagnostic correlation study comparing teledermatology and in-person consultations.
- Evaluation of diagnostic certainty levels (scale 1-10) for both consultation types.
- Analysis of biopsy recommendation frequency by teledermatologists versus clinic-based evaluators.
Main Results:
- Diagnostic certainty was significantly lower in teledermatology (7/10) compared to in-person evaluations (9/10).
- This difference in diagnostic certainty was consistent across all evaluated skin condition categories (P <= .0065).
- Teledermatologists recommended biopsies 10% more frequently than in-person evaluators.
Conclusions:
- Teledermatology demonstrates effectiveness in delivering dermatologic care within suitable settings.
- Lower diagnostic certainty in teledermatology warrants further investigation into contributing factors and study limitations.
- Despite differences, teledermatology shows potential as a valuable tool in dermatology practice.
Abstract:
This is part II of an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study comparing teledermatology with traditional face-to-face evaluation. Part I discussed the methodology and diagnostic correlation results between teledermatology and in-person consultation (Cutis. 2003;71:399-403). This second part reports the diagnostic certainty level between the 2 groups, which are shown to be significantly different (teledermatology, 7/10; in-person, 9/10). This difference held true in every category of skin condition evaluated (P < or = .0065). Unlike other studies, we found that teledermatologists recommended biopsies 10% more frequently than clinic-based evaluators. We discuss the reasons for the lower diagnostic certainty level of teledermatologists, as well as the limitations of this study. Despite the limitations, we conclude that teledermatology appears to be an effective method of delivering dermatologic care in the appropriate setting.
More Related Videos
05:21In Vivo Confocal Microscopy: A Standard Operating Procedure for the Detection of Demodex Mites at the Eyelid Margin
Published on: July 3, 2025
08:13In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye: A Focus on Imaging Protocols and Interpretation
Published on: November 11, 2025