Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood
Published on: February 8, 2016
Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays
Holden T Maecker1, Aline Rinfret, Patricia D'Souza
1BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA. holden_maecker@bd.com
Insights
Standardizing intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays across labs improves T cell response comparisons for vaccine development. Centralized analysis and cryopreserved cells enhance precision, especially for higher-frequency responses.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Vaccinology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Cytokine flow cytometry (CFC) or intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) quantitates antigen-specific T cell responses.
- Standardization of ICS is crucial for comparing vaccine immunogenicity across international clinical trials.
- A multi-laboratory study aimed to define ICS inter-laboratory precision for HIV clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish the inter-laboratory precision of intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays.
- To evaluate different sample types and analysis methods for ICS standardization.
- To provide a common platform for comparing vaccine immunogenicity in clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Three sample types (whole blood, cryopreserved PBMC) were tested across multiple laboratories.
- Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays used common protocols with cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 peptide mix.
- Lyophilized reagents and centralized data analysis with a dynamic gating template were employed for standardization.
Main Results:
- Mean inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (C.V.) ranged from 17-44%, varying by sample type and analysis.
- Cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) showed lower inter-lab C.V.s than whole blood.
- Centralized analysis reduced inter-lab C.V. by 5-20%, with lowest variability for high-frequency T cell responses (>0.5% IFNγ).
Conclusions:
- Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays demonstrate good inter-laboratory precision with a common protocol.
- Precision improves with higher frequencies of responding T cells and is enhanced by centralized analysis.
- Cryopreserved PBMC and standardized reagents (e.g., lyophilized) offer greater consistency for ICS assays.
Background:
Cytokine flow cytometry (CFC) or intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) can quantitate antigen-specific T cell responses in settings such as experimental vaccination. Standardization of ICS among laboratories performing vaccine studies would provide a common platform by which to compare the immunogenicity of different vaccine candidates across multiple international organizations conducting clinical trials. As such, a study was carried out among several laboratories involved in HIV clinical trials, to define the inter-lab precision of ICS using various sample types, and using a common protocol for each experiment (see additional files online).
Results:
Three sample types (activated, fixed, and frozen whole blood; fresh whole blood; and cryopreserved PBMC) were shipped to various sites, where ICS assays using cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 peptide mix or control antigens were performed in parallel in 96-well plates. For one experiment, antigens and antibody cocktails were lyophilised into 96-well plates to simplify and standardize the assay setup. Results ((CD4+)cytokine+ cells and (CD8+)cytokine+ cells) were determined by each site. Raw data were also sent to a central site for batch analysis with a dynamic gating template. Mean inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (C.V.) ranged from 17-44% depending upon the sample type and analysis method. Cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) yielded lower inter-lab C.V.'s than whole blood. Centralized analysis (using a dynamic gating template) reduced the inter-lab C.V. by 5-20%, depending upon the experiment. The inter-lab C.V. was lowest (18-24%) for samples with a mean of > 0.5% IFNgamma + T cells, and highest (57-82%) for samples with a mean of < 0.1% IFNgamma + cells.
Conclusion:
ICS assays can be performed by multiple laboratories using a common protocol with good inter-laboratory precision, which improves as the frequency of responding cells increases. Cryopreserved PBMC may yield slightly more consistent results than shipped whole blood. Analysis, particularly gating, is a significant source of variability, and can be reduced by centralized analysis and/or use of a standardized dynamic gating template. Use of pre-aliquoted lyophilized reagents for stimulation and staining can provide further standardization to these assays.
More Related Videos
11:00Multiplex Cytokine Profiling of Stimulated Mouse Splenocytes Using a Cytometric Bead-based Immunoassay Platform
Published on: November 9, 2017
06:22Standardization of Transfer across Labs between Flow Cytometers for Detection of Lymphocytes in Japanese Encephalitis Vaccinated Children
Published on: February 10, 2023