Blastoid and common variants of mantle cell lymphoma exhibit distinct immunophenotypic and interphase FISH features

M Parrens1, M-A Belaud-Rotureau, O Fitoussi

  • 1Department of Pathology and Tumour Biology, CHU Bordeaux and Equipe 2406, University of Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France. marie.parrens@chu-bordeaux.fr

Histopathology
|February 21, 2006
PubMed

Insights

Blastoid variant mantle cell lymphoma (BV-MCL) has poorer treatment outcomes than common MCL. Phenotypic and cytogenetic markers, alongside morphology, are crucial for accurate BV-MCL diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) diagnosis relies on morphology.
  • Blastoid variant MCL (BV-MCL) presents distinct clinical behavior.
  • Accurate differentiation of BV-MCL is clinically significant.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze clinicopathological features of BV-MCL.
  • To assess proliferation index, cyclin D1, and CDK4 expression in MCL subtypes.
  • To evaluate interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) patterns in BV-MCL.

Main Methods:

  • Morphological analysis of 18 MCL cases (4 BV-MCL).
  • Immunohistochemistry for cyclin D1, CDK4, and MIB-1 (Ki67).
  • Interphase FISH with t(11;14) and chromosome probes (11, 18, 21).

Main Results:

  • BV-MCL showed shorter response duration (11 vs. 28 months) and overall survival (20 vs. 42 months) compared to common MCL.
  • All MCL cases had t(11;14); BV-MCL exhibited extra CCND1 signals due to hypotetraploidy.
  • BV-MCL cases displayed high cyclin D1/CDK4 expression and MIB-1 index >50%.

Conclusions:

  • Morphological distinction alone is insufficient for BV-MCL recognition.
  • Phenotypic and cytogenetic criteria are essential for improved BV-MCL diagnosis.
  • Accurate diagnosis of BV-MCL impacts clinical management and prognosis.
Abstract