Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

The Development of Lyophilized Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification Reagents for the Detection of Coxiella burnetii
Published on: April 18, 2016
Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for acute Q fever in an outbreak setting
Mischa M Jager1, Gezina Weers-Pothoff, Mirjam H A Hermans
1Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5200 ME 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Insights
A new diagnostic algorithm for acute Q fever, utilizing an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for immunoglobulin M antibodies (MII screen), significantly reduced testing by over 80%. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) also aided in diagnosing Q fever in many patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The 2009 Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands necessitated efficient diagnostic strategies.
- Traditional diagnostic methods for Q fever can be resource-intensive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a novel diagnostic algorithm for acute Q fever.
- To assess the impact of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MII screen) on diagnostic workflow.
- To determine the contribution of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to Q fever diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 825 patients during a 17-day period.
- Implementation of a diagnostic algorithm starting with an MII screen for Coxiella burnetii antibodies.
- Subsequent use of immunofluorescence assay or PCR based on MII screen results and clinical data.
Main Results:
- Acute Q fever was diagnosed in 256 patients.
- The MII screen reduced the number of immunofluorescence assays by over 80%.
- PCR analysis contributed to the diagnosis in 103 patients.
- Diagnostic challenges included missing onset dates and lack of follow-up samples.
Conclusions:
- The MII screen is an effective initial step for diagnosing acute Q fever, significantly reducing workload.
- PCR plays a valuable role in confirming Q fever diagnoses.
- Improved data collection, such as date of onset and follow-up samples, is crucial for effective diagnostics.
Abstract:
In the peak of the 2009 Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands, we introduced a diagnostic algorithm for acute Q fever with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for immunoglobulin M antibodies to Coxiella burnetii phase II antigens (MII screen) as an initial step. Subsequently, an immunofluorescence assay or PCR was performed depending on the MII screen outcome, date of onset of disease, and inpatient or outpatient setting. The impact of MII screen on the number of immunofluorescence assays performed and the contribution of PCR to diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated in 825 patients referred in a 17-day period. Acute Q fever was diagnosed in 256 patients. The introduction of MII screen reduced the number of immunofluorescence assays performed by more than 80%. In 103 patients, PCR analysis contributed to the diagnosis of acute Q fever. Q fever diagnostics were hampered by the fact that for a high number of patients the date of onset of disease was not provided and the requested follow-up serum samples were not received.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Automated Microbial Diagnostics