Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Automated Quantification of Hematopoietic Cell – Stromal Cell Interactions in Histological Images of Undecalcified Bone
Published on: April 8, 2015
Morphometric image analysis and eosinophil counts in human liver allografts
Insights
Histological assessment of liver allografts can be challenging. This study found that quantifying eosinophils in liver biopsies is a specific and sensitive marker for acute cellular rejection, aiding in severity grading.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation immunology
- Graft rejection diagnostics
- Liver pathology
Background:
- Histology is the standard for diagnosing acute cellular rejection in liver allografts.
- Accurate grading of rejection severity and differentiation from other infiltrates remain difficult.
- Previous research suggested eosinophils as potential specific markers for rejection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitate eosinophil counts in liver allograft biopsies.
- To evaluate morphometric image analysis for assessing rejection severity.
- To determine the specificity and sensitivity of eosinophils in diagnosing acute cellular rejection.
Main Methods:
- Quantified eosinophil counts in 92 biopsies from 25 patients.
- Used morphometric image analysis to measure portal tract area and cell density in 30 patients' day 5 protocol biopsies.
- Compared findings with control groups: no rejection, CMV infection, and obscure liver dysfunction.
Main Results:
- Portal tract cross-sectional area, inflammatory cell count, and density increased significantly with rejection severity.
- Eosinophil counts were specific for acute cellular rejection and correlated positively with rejection severity.
- Eosinophils were absent in non-rejection, CMV, and obscure dysfunction groups; counts decreased after treatment.
Conclusions:
- Eosinophil quantification is a specific diagnostic feature for acute cellular rejection in liver allografts.
- Morphometric analysis of portal tracts aids in assessing rejection severity.
- Eosinophils can help differentiate acute cellular rejection from other liver conditions.
Abstract:
Histology of liver allografts is the gold standard for diagnosis of acute cellular rejection. However, scoring the severity of rejection and distinguishing it from other infiltrations is not easy. Only one group has evaluated biopsies morphometrically and also suggested that eosinophils are a specific diagnostic feature. We quantitated eosinophil count in 92 biopsies in a group of 25 patients and, in another group of 30 patients, used morphometric image analysis to measure the cross-sectional area and cell density in each portal tract in day 5 protocol liver biopsies. Rejection was diagnosed by pathological evaluation confirmed with clinical and biochemical graft dysfunction graded histologically into mild or moderate-to-severe. The control groups were five patients with no rejection, nine patients with CMV infection, and eight biopsies in eight patients for whom the cause of the liver dysfunction was obscure. The cross-sectional area, the inflammatory cell count of each portal tract and the mean portal tract inflammatory cell density (cells/mm2) increased with the severity of rejection. In each case the regression coefficient was statistically significant. Correlating the mean of the total inflammatory cell count with the mean of the portal inflammatory cell density (cell/mm2) gave far better separation of the mild rejection and moderate-to-severe rejection groups. Eosinophils were specific for the presence of acute cellular rejection and increased with the severity of rejection. They were absent in the no rejection group, in the CMV group and in those with obscure liver dysfunction. The eosinophil count fell markedly following treatment of rejection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
More Related Videos
07:13Application of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in a Rat Model of NAFLD/NASH
Published on: April 20, 2021
04:42Picrosirius Red Staining for Semiquantitative Histopathologic Evaluation of Collagen Deposition in Murine Models of Chronic Lung Allograft Rejection
Published on: March 21, 2025