Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

525
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
525
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

592
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
592
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

195
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
195
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

296
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
296
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

254
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
254

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Gradient boosting-based discrete failure time model for selecting time-varying effects and interactions.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same author

State Spending Growth Benchmarks and Hospital Revenue, Hospital Prices, and Premiums.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Data Quality and Integrity Program.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2026
Same author

α/β for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors Treated With Radiation Therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

KULLBACK-LEIBLER-BASED DISCRETE FAILURE TIME MODELS FOR INTEGRATION OF PUBLISHED PREDICTION MODELS WITH NEW TIME-TO-EVENT DATASET.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.

JAMA health forum·2025

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Un enfoque de imputación múltiple para la incidencia acumulada, con implicaciones para la estimación de la varianza

Elizabeth C Chase1, Philip S Boonstra2, Jeremy M G Taylor2

  • 1RAND Corporation.

The American statistician
|August 20, 2025
PubMed
Resumen

Este estudio introduce un nuevo método de imputación múltiple para estimar las funciones de incidencia acumuladas en riesgos concurrentes. El enfoque simplifica los análisis complejos y ofrece una estimación de incertidumbre flexible, alineada con los métodos establecidos.

Palabras clave:
Riesgos en competenciaImputación múltipleProporciónRedistribuir a la derechaAnálisis de la supervivencia

Más Videos Relacionados

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Estadísticas biológicas
  • Epidemiología
  • Análisis de la supervivencia

Sus antecedentes:

  • La estimación de la incidencia acumulada en los riesgos competidores es crucial para comprender las probabilidades de eventos.
  • Los métodos existentes como el estimador de Aalen-Johansen son ampliamente utilizados, pero pueden tener limitaciones.
  • Se necesitan enfoques alternativos para mejorar la flexibilidad y la estimación de la incertidumbre.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Presentar un nuevo método de imputación múltiple no paramétrico para estimar la función de incidencia acumulada.
  • Para demostrar la equivalencia de este nuevo método con el estimador de Aalen-Johansen.
  • Resaltar las ventajas del enfoque de imputación para el análisis de resultados binarios y la estimación de la incertidumbre.

Principales métodos:

  • Se utilizó la imputación múltiple no paramétrica para transformar el problema de los riesgos de competencia.
  • Se redujo la estimación de la función de incidencia acumulada a la estimación de una proporción binomial.
  • Se han realizado análisis matemáticos y empíricos para compararlos con el estimador de Aalen-Johansen.

Principales resultados:

  • Se demostró que el estimador basado en la imputación es equivalente al estimador de Aalen-Johansen con suficientes imputaciones.
  • El método propuesto permite una gama más amplia de técnicas estadísticas para el análisis de resultados binarios.
  • En el nuevo marco se identificaron opciones mejoradas para la estimación de la incertidumbre.

Conclusiones:

  • El nuevo enfoque de imputación múltiple proporciona una alternativa sólida para la estimación de la función de incidencia acumulada.
  • Este método ofrece una mayor flexibilidad en el análisis estadístico y la cuantificación de la incertidumbre.
  • La estrategia de imputación es potencialmente extensible a escenarios de riesgos competidores más complejos.