フォスファタゼSHP2は,長期記憶誘導のための間隔効果を調節する
Mario R Pagani1, Kimihiko Oishi, Bruce D Gelb
1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Cell
|October 7, 2009
まとめ
長期記憶 (LTM) 形成における間隔効果は,ドロソフィラのコルクスクルー (CSW) タンパク質活動によって調節されます. CSWは,メモリに必要な休憩間隔に影響を与え,メモリ統合の分子基盤の洞察を提供します.
科学分野:
- 神経科学は神経科学である.
- 分子生物学は分子生物学である.
- 遺伝学 遺伝学とは
背景:
- 長期記憶 (LTM) の誘導には,間隔トレーニングセッションが必要であり,この現象は"間隔効果"として知られています.
- スパッシング効果とその調節の基礎となる分子機構は完全に理解されていません.
研究 の 目的:
- DrosophilaにおけるLTM誘導の間隔効果の調節におけるタンパク質チロシンリン酸塩酵素コルクスクリュー (CSW) の役割を調査する.
- 記憶統合におけるCSWとMAPKのシグナル伝達に関わる分子経路を解明する.
主な方法:
- ドロソフィラキノコの体ニューロンのCSW活動の遺伝子操作.
- LTM誘導と試験間隔を評価するための行動分析.
- CSWに依存するMAPKの活性化と無活性化サイクルの生化学分析.
主要な成果:
- 野生型のCSWの過剰発現は,LTM誘導に必要な休息間隔を短縮しました.
- 構成的に活性なCSWの過剰発現は,これらの休息間隔を長引かせた.
- LTM誘発トレーニングは,CSW依存のMAPK活性化の繰り返し波を生成し,波長が休憩間隔の持続時間と相関していた.
結論:
- CSWの活動レベルは,ドロソフィラのLTM誘導に不可欠な休息時間の長さを直接調節する.
- CSWはMAPK不活性化サイクルに影響を与え,間隔効果のための分子機構を提供します.
- 発見は,記憶の統合の分子基礎と,認知状態との潜在的な関連性についての洞察を提供します.
さらに関連する動画
11:29Investigation of Synaptic Tagging/Capture and Cross-capture using Acute Hippocampal Slices from Rodents
Published on: September 4, 2015
14.6K
09:39Improved Preparation and Preservation of Hippocampal Mouse Slices for a Very Stable and Reproducible Recording of Long-term Potentiation
Published on: June 26, 2013
27.6K
関連する概念動画
Long-term Potentiation
58.2K
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre- and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
58.2K
Long-term Potentiation
3.4K
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
3.4K
Long-term Depression
3.0K
Long-term depression, or LTD, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTD is the process of synaptic weakening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic weakening of LTD works in opposition to synaptic strengthening by long-term potentiation (LTP) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over...
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over...
3.0K
Long-term Depression
33.0K
Long-term depression, or LTD, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTD is the process of synaptic weakening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic weakening of LTD works in opposition to synaptic strengthening by long-term potentiation (LTP) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
33.0K
Calmodulin-dependent Signaling
6.0K
Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium-binding protein in eukaryotes that controls various calcium-regulated cellular processes. It has four calcium-binding sites that bind calcium to form the calcium-calmodulin ( Ca2+-CaM) complex. GPCR stimulation increases the calcium levels in the cells that bind to CaM and induces a conformational change.
The Ca2+-CaM complex does not have enzymatic activity by itself. Instead, the complex binds downstream target proteins, including membrane proteins or enzymes,...
The Ca2+-CaM complex does not have enzymatic activity by itself. Instead, the complex binds downstream target proteins, including membrane proteins or enzymes,...
6.0K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
7.8K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.8K
