Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

525
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
525
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

592
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
592
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

195
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
195
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

296
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
296
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

254
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
254

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Gradient boosting-based discrete failure time model for selecting time-varying effects and interactions.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same author

State Spending Growth Benchmarks and Hospital Revenue, Hospital Prices, and Premiums.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Data Quality and Integrity Program.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2026
Same author

α/β for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors Treated With Radiation Therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

KULLBACK-LEIBLER-BASED DISCRETE FAILURE TIME MODELS FOR INTEGRATION OF PUBLISHED PREDICTION MODELS WITH NEW TIME-TO-EVENT DATASET.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.

JAMA health forum·2025

関連する実験動画

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

累積インシデンスに対する複数の推算方法,差異推定への影響

Elizabeth C Chase1, Philip S Boonstra2, Jeremy M G Taylor2

  • 1RAND Corporation.

The American statistician
|August 20, 2025
PubMed
まとめ

この研究は,競合するリスクにおける累積的な発生関数を推定するための新しい複数の帰算法を導入しています. このアプローチは複雑な分析を簡素化し,確立された方法と整合した柔軟な不確実性推定を提供します.

科学分野:

  • バイオ統計学
  • エピデミオロジー
  • 生存分析

背景:

  • 競合するリスクにおける累積的なインシデントを推定することは,イベントの確率を理解するために極めて重要です.
  • Aalen-Johansen推定器のような既存の方法は広く使用されていますが,限界があります.
  • 柔軟性や不確実性の見積もりを高めるための代替アプローチが必要である.

研究 の 目的:

  • 累積インシデンス関数を推定するための新しい非パラメトリックの複数割り算方法を提示する.
  • この新しい方法がアレン・ヨハンセン推定値と同等であることを証明する.
  • バイナリー結果の分析と不確実性の推定のための帰算アプローチの利点を強調する.

主な方法:

  • 競合するリスクの問題を変換するために,非パラメトリックの複数割り算を使用した.
  • 累積的発生関数の推定を二項比率の推定に減らした.
  • Aalen-Johansenの推定値と比較するために数学的および経験的分析を行いました.

主要な成果:

  • 算数に基づく推定値は,十分な算数を持つアレン-ヨハンセン推定値と同等であることが示された.
  • 提案された方法は,バイナリー結果分析のためのより幅広い統計的テクニックを可能にします.
キーワード:
競合するリスクマルチプルアピュテーション割合右に再分配する生存分析

さらに関連する動画

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
  • 新しい枠組みの中で,不確実性の推定のための強化されたオプションが特定されました.
  • 結論:

    • 累積的なインシデンス関数の見積もりには,新しい複数の帰算方法が強力な代替手段を提供します.
    • この方法は,統計分析と不確実性の定量化においてより大きな柔軟性を提供します.
    • 計算戦略は,より複雑な競合するリスクシナリオに潜在的に拡張できます.