DOCSIC: A Mean-Field Method for Orbital-by-Orbital Self-Interaction Correction

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859, United States.
  • 2Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Física. Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • 3CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA), Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • 4Departamento de Ciencias Exactas, Ciclo Básico Común, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • 5Instituto de Investigaciones Matemáticas “Luis A. Santaló” (IMAS), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • 6Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco, Apdo. 644, E-48080 Bilbao, Spain.
  • 7Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Diag. 113 y 64 (S/N), Sucursal 4, CC 16, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.

Published on:

Abstract

We introduce a new method to remove the one-electron self-interaction error in approximate density functional calculations on an orbital-by-orbital basis, as originally proposed by Perdew and Zunger [ , , 5048]. This method is motivated by a recent proposal by Pederson et al. [ , , 121103] to remove self-interaction that employs orbitals derived from the real-space density matrix, known as FLOSIC (Fermi Löwdin orbitals self-interaction correction). However, instead of Fermi Löwdin orbitals, our scheme utilizes columns of the density matrix to determine localized orbitals, like the localization procedure proposed by Fuemmeler et al. [ , , 8572]. The new method, dubbed DOCSIC for density matrix as orbital coefficients self-interaction correction, contrasts with traditional Perdew-Zunger or FLOSIC in that it does not incorporate additional optimization parameters, and, unlike the average density self-interaction correction of Ciofini et al. [ , , 12], it makes use of localized orbitals. Another advantage of DOCSIC is that it can be implemented as a mean-field formalism. We show details of the self-consistent generalized Kohn-Sham implementation, some illustrative results, and we finally highlight its advantages and limitations.

Related Concept Videos

JoVE Research Video for Molecular Orbital Theory II 03:51

18.0K

Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams

The relative energy levels of atomic and molecular orbitals are typically shown in a molecular orbital diagram. For a diatomic molecule, the atomic orbitals of one atom are shown on the left, and those of the other atom are shown on the right. Each horizontal line represents one orbital that can hold two electrons. The molecular orbitals formed by the combination of the atomic orbitals are shown in the center. Dashed lines show which of the atomic orbitals…

JoVE Research Video for Molecular Orbital Theory I 02:35

29.7K

Overview of Molecular Orbital Theory

Molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in the same way as the distribution of electrons in atoms is described using atomic orbitals. Quantum mechanics describes the behavior of an electron in a molecule by a wave function, Ψ, analogous to the behavior in an atom. Just like electrons around isolated atoms, electrons around atoms in molecules are limited to discrete (quantized) energies. The region of space in which…

JoVE Research Video for MO Theory and Covalent Bonding 02:40

9.7K

The molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in a manner similar to the distribution of electrons in atomic orbitals. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be found is called a molecular orbital. Mathematically, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) generates molecular orbitals. Combinations of in-phase atomic orbital wave functions result in regions with a high probability of electron density, while…

JoVE Research Video for Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II 03:35

30.1K

sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization

To describe the five bonding orbitals in a trigonal bipyramidal arrangement, we must use five of the valence shell atomic orbitals (the s orbital, the three p orbitals, and one of the d orbitals), which gives five sp3d hybrid orbitals. With an octahedral arrangement of six hybrid orbitals, we must use six valence shell atomic orbitals (the s orbital, the three p orbitals, and two of the d orbitals in its valence shell), which gives six sp3d 2 hybrid…

JoVE Research Video for The Energies of Atomic Orbitals 03:21

22.9K

In an atom, the negatively charged electrons are attracted to the positively charged nucleus. In a multielectron atom, electron-electron repulsions are also observed. The attractive and repulsive forces are dependent on the distance between the particles, as well as the sign and magnitude of the charges on the individual particles. When the charges on the particles are opposite, they attract each other. If both particles have the same charge, they repel each other.

As the magnitude of the…

JoVE Research Video for Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I 03:24

44.2K

The mathematical expression known as the wave function, ψ, contains information about each orbital and the wavelike properties of electrons in an isolated atom. When atoms are bound together in a molecule, the wave functions combine to produce new mathematical descriptions that have different shapes. This process of combining the wave functions for atomic orbitals is called hybridization and is mathematically accomplished by the linear combination of atomic orbitals. The new orbitals that…