相关实验视频
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.4K
在集团间的背景下不诚实合作.
Tjits van Lent1, Thijs Verwijmeren1, Gijsbert Bijlstra1
1Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
The British journal of social psychology
|August 21, 2023
概括
与他人合作可以增加不诚实的行为. 然而,研究表明,不诚实程度是相似的,无论是与内组成员还是外组成员合作.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 伦理学 伦理学 伦理学
背景情况:
- 合作活动可以增加不诚实行为的倾向.
- 影响这种现象的具体因素,特别是合作者的身份,仍未得到充分研究.
研究的目的:
- 为了复制合作对不诚实的既定效果.
- 调查与内组成员合作,与外组成员相比,是否会放大不诚实的行为.
主要方法:
- 三项预先注册的研究 (N=782) 采用了顺序二次式压模式.
- 该范式在实验室 (学生样本) 和现场 (社区样本) 设置中进行了管理.
- 参与者与内组或外组成员组建了二元组,以评估报告的子投中的不诚实行为,以获得潜在的胜利.
主要成果:
- 这些研究成功地复制了不诚实的协作效应,证明了它在不同样本和环境中的稳定性.
- 在与内组成员与外组成员合作时,没有观察到不诚实的显著差异.
- 调查结果表明,在这个范式中,内集团-外集团动态不会放大协作不诚实.
结论:
- 合作不诚实是一个强大的现象,在各种环境中一直观察到.
- 合作者的身份 (内组与外组) 似乎不是调整不诚实的程度的重要因素.
- 需要进行进一步的研究,以探索在缺乏集团间效应的情况下推动合作不诚实的替代机制.
相关概念视频
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Surveys
14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Groupthink
44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K

