Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Current developments of Psychological Research and the use of AI.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Shifting focus: Does adaptation to new configural face information alter fixation behavior?

Vision research·2026
Same author

Face adaptation: Investigating non-configural contrast alterations.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Evidence for a Latent Bottleneck After Extensive Dual-Task Practice of a Visual-Manual and an Auditory-Verbal Task.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Updates from the journal.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

A central bottleneck perspective on research in the Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception & performance and beyond.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K

实践对双重任务顺序协调及其顺序调整的影响.

Tilo Strobach1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany. tilo.strobach@medicalschool-hamburg.de.

Psychonomic bulletin & review
|February 27, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

双重任务实践提高了任务顺序的协调,但不是调整. 这表明协调任务顺序和调整这种协调涉及不同的认知过程.

关键词:
认知可塑性 认知可塑性双重任务 双重任务 双重任务练习双重任务的实践任务顺序 任务顺序 任务顺序任务顺序控制 任务顺序控制

更多相关视频

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.
  • 人类因素 人类因素

背景情况:

  • 当任务在时间上重叠时,双重任务的性能往往会导致损害.
  • 现有的研究主要解释控制机制,而不是双重任务中的任务顺序协调.

研究的目的:

  • 调查实践对任务顺序协调绩效的影响.
  • 检查任务顺序协调和认知元控制调整之间的关系.
  • 确定实践是否会对协调和调整产生不同的影响.

主要方法:

  • 使用视听双任务,随机更改任务顺序.
  • 参与者进行了四次双任务练习或单任务练习 (N=24个).
  • 在实践后评估了任务顺序协调和调整能力.

主要成果:

  • 任务顺序协调在双重任务实践后显著改善.
  • 单一任务实践并没有在任务顺序协调方面产生类似的改进.
  • 实践并没有实质性地影响任务顺序协调的调整.

结论:

  • 任务顺序协调通过特定的双重任务实践得到改善.
  • 任务顺序协调的调整似乎独立于实践效应.
  • 这些发现支持任务顺序协调与其顺序调整过程之间的分离.